This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "Technology Matrix Cell Transitions"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[category:RIMBAA Issue]]  
 
[[category:RIMBAA Issue]]  
 
==Summary==
 
==Summary==
*Document/describe (for all possible cell transations) how those steps could be supported/achieved.  
+
*Document/describe (for all possible cell transations in the [[Technology Matrix]]) how those steps could be supported/achieved.  
  
 
==Analysis==
 
==Analysis==

Revision as of 13:51, 22 January 2009

Summary

  • Document/describe (for all possible cell transations in the Technology Matrix) how those steps could be supported/achieved.

Analysis

  • Suggestion was made (during the Orlando WGM) to describe the problem-space (type of problem) as well as the path itself. That to determine if different problem spaces lead to different paths through the technology matrix.

Transitions in Dimension 1

Persistent RepresentationObject RepresentationSerialized Representation
RIM (generic) ModelRPRORS (XML ITS new!)
RIM Constrained Information ModelCPCOCS (XML ITS)
Application Specific ModelAPAOAS

The following transitions were deemed to be worthwile of our description:

  • RP-RO
    • RO<->RP: ORM software, e.g. Hibernate
  • RO-RS
  • CP-CO
  • CO-CS
  • AO-CO
  • CO-RO
  • AO-RO
  • AS-CS
  • AS-RS
  • CS-RS

Note that diagonal cell transitions (e.g. CO to RS) were decided always to involve (however minimalistically) the adjacent *O square (in this example: RO). Therefore diagonal transitions won't be documented/analysed.

Transitions in Dimension 2

Processing/Business LogicObject RepresentationUser Interface
PLROUI
CO
AO

The PL-*O tranition issue is described on another wiki page: Processing Logic in RIMBAA Applications.

Some thoughts about the UI is discussed on User Interface for RIMBAA Applications.