This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "RIMBAA 200901 WGM Agenda"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
Note: Peter Hendler won't be present dusing this WGM.
+
="RIMBAA in Floridaa"=
  
 
==Monday Q3 (13:45-15:00)==
 
==Monday Q3 (13:45-15:00)==
 
*Approval of agenda for the week, minutes of the last WGM
 
*Approval of agenda for the week, minutes of the last WGM
 +
*Note: Peter Hendler won't be present dusing this WGM.
 
* RIMBAA project/product presentation
 
* RIMBAA project/product presentation
  
Line 8: Line 9:
 
* RIMBAA project/product presentation
 
* RIMBAA project/product presentation
  
==Tuesday Q6 (19:30-21:00)==
+
==Tuesday Q6 (19:30-21:00 - after Neotool)==
*This session starts just after the Neotool party
+
*A brainstorm type discussion about how RIMBAA applications fit within the HL7 SAEAF framework
 +
**Should RIMBAA be part of the architecture framework? Is it already part of the framework?
 +
**Should HL7 change its mission to be about application architectures? Why, or why not?
  
=== Subjects for Discussion ===
+
= Subjects for Discussion =
 
*How to do a Connectathon? Or we could do a connecthathon.
 
*How to do a Connectathon? Or we could do a connecthathon.
 
**Can we test the exchange of serialized RIM-based instances between RIMBAA applications?
 
**Can we test the exchange of serialized RIM-based instances between RIMBAA applications?

Revision as of 09:14, 30 December 2008

"RIMBAA in Floridaa"

Monday Q3 (13:45-15:00)

  • Approval of agenda for the week, minutes of the last WGM
  • Note: Peter Hendler won't be present dusing this WGM.
  • RIMBAA project/product presentation

Monday Q4 (15:30-17:00)

  • RIMBAA project/product presentation

Tuesday Q6 (19:30-21:00 - after Neotool)

  • A brainstorm type discussion about how RIMBAA applications fit within the HL7 SAEAF framework
    • Should RIMBAA be part of the architecture framework? Is it already part of the framework?
    • Should HL7 change its mission to be about application architectures? Why, or why not?

Subjects for Discussion

  • How to do a Connectathon? Or we could do a connecthathon.
    • Can we test the exchange of serialized RIM-based instances between RIMBAA applications?
  • Database with ISO datatypes
    • If we define the ISO datatypes as User Defined Datatypes - what are the advantages? How would this be combined with ORM solutions?
  • RIMBAA Reference Architecture
    • What would this look like?
    • What is the relationship with the EHR-SD RM (System Design Reference Model) and H-SOA-RA?
  • Generated SQL database and mapping rules
  • A CIM DIM ;-)
    • Can we create a SOA Common Information Model?
    • Michael vd Zel: We (UMCG) use something very similar to Clinical Document R-MIM, only with multiple entry points, more from the Clinical Statement, ergo DIM. I heard there are harmonisation efforts to update the Clinical Statement part of the Clinical Document with the Clinical Statement work done in Care Provision.
  • Best practices generating code using the informative schemas. For Java & .Net & others? (See discussion in the tooling list on "XML Binding Frameworks")
    • Schema improvement project 2008NE (March?) - XML Binding Frameworks
    • Have classes/CMETs extend each other. E.g. Observation extends Act, PatientLite extend PatientIdentified etc.
    • Make this a joined effort with Xml schema enhancement