This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "November 13, 2018 Security Conference Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
'''Meeting Minute Approval''' - November 6, 2018 | '''Meeting Minute Approval''' - November 6, 2018 | ||
− | * (Motion to | + | * (Motion to approve (Suzanne/Kathleen): Vote: objections/abstentions: none; |
((Suzanne to add harmonization proposal link)) | ((Suzanne to add harmonization proposal link)) | ||
'''Update on PASS Audit reconciliation | '''Update on PASS Audit reconciliation | ||
− | * last understood was that reconciliation comments were completed and we could ask for withdrawal | + | * last understood was that reconciliation comments were completed, and we could ask for withdrawal |
* Kathleen brought up that Bernd B wants to see corrections in the document before he withdrawals | * Kathleen brought up that Bernd B wants to see corrections in the document before he withdrawals | ||
** as far as Mike is concerned we should push forward and request withdrawal of negative | ** as far as Mike is concerned we should push forward and request withdrawal of negative | ||
− | * e-mail from | + | * e-mail from Lynn Laakso; there was material due in order to ballot TF4FA; she has listed that one and two have not been published? was this a new requirement...Kathleen asked if this was a new rule? which could be a show stopper... |
** we will wait and see what her answer is before proceeding. Current answer is we don't know. | ** we will wait and see what her answer is before proceeding. Current answer is we don't know. | ||
'''Harmonization codes | '''Harmonization codes | ||
− | * all three proposals were approved; | + | * all three proposals were approved; Kathleen is deferring the codes that were not completed to next harmonization |
* policy codes have been brought into v2 | * policy codes have been brought into v2 | ||
* next harmonization | * next harmonization | ||
− | * there were changes in the xx ballot to update | + | * there were changes in the xx ballot to update confidentiality |
V2.9 HL7 access proposal | V2.9 HL7 access proposal | ||
* in chapter 4; want clarification. security labels content is different than found in orders | * in chapter 4; want clarification. security labels content is different than found in orders | ||
− | * two sections which are talking about kind of labs--they were using vocabulary that was close to vocab in v3; which we changed years ago because of a mix of sensitivity and | + | * two sections which are talking about kind of labs--they were using vocabulary that was close to vocab in v3; which we changed years ago because of a mix of sensitivity and confidentiality--Kathleen proposes that the codes be retired |
− | * | + | * recommendation is that they use the ARV segment be used which can point to any part of the lab order for results--removing table from both segments where they currently occur; avoiding conflict, note this is not a controversial issue...strictly clean-up. Rikki Merrick is trying to get into OO agenda to get in publishing of v2.9 clean-up |
− | * question on | + | * question on harmonization – (Mike) this is a vocabulary--where does Hl7 specify where these marking are optional or mandatory?... <Kathleen response> no, there is a specific policy; it says what is in the law; so, it’s still an interpretation of the law. |
− | **mike - part of the law 7332; has to do with what we've determined are the handling instructions... HII of the law; he has it from the legal folks, that their | + | **mike - part of the law 7332; has to do with what we've determined are the handling instructions... HII of the law; he has it from the legal folks, that their interpretations that its a requirement on the recipient not of the VA--or to tell them that such a restriction exists |
− | **if 7332 hadn't been | + | **if 7332 hadn't been specified for just health; there is something in the law (if specified)… then |
(listen to recording) | (listen to recording) | ||
− | ** in | + | ** in other words, it’s up to the implementer to decide on the language |
HL7 2 to FHIR PSS''' | HL7 2 to FHIR PSS''' | ||
− | * | + | * standards approach mapping from v2 to FHIR |
− | * each | + | * each of the datatypes; |
− | * effort is underway ( | + | * effort is underway (meetings every other week); the mapping between chapter 9 con segment and the FHIR consent and contract |
− | ** | + | ** important in regard to the transform; having capability from going from one set to another. i.e. get transform set into FHIR (confirm) |
Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
* current build is frozen | * current build is frozen | ||
* because of HIMSS several subjects are up in the air | * because of HIMSS several subjects are up in the air | ||
− | * September care | + | * September care planning are not going to be at HIMSS--and not be at the January WGM--this will lower about ability to move with security and consent--we will still be able to do work with break glass |
Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
additional agenda items? | additional agenda items? | ||
− | + | None | |
− | Motion t | + | Motion t adjourn (Kathleen) |
Meeting adjourned at 1320 Arizona Time --[[User:Suzannegw|Suzannegw]] ([[User talk:Suzannegw|talk]]) 15:20, 13 November 2018 (EST) | Meeting adjourned at 1320 Arizona Time --[[User:Suzannegw|Suzannegw]] ([[User talk:Suzannegw|talk]]) 15:20, 13 November 2018 (EST) | ||
+ | Temporary Recording: https:fccdl.in/yN1FTQeUV | ||
[[Security|Back to Security Main Page]] | [[Security|Back to Security Main Page]] |
Latest revision as of 20:53, 13 November 2018
Attendees
x | Member Name | x | Member Name | x | Member Name | x | Member Name | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | John Moehrke Security Co-chair | x | Kathleen Connor Security Co-chair | x | Alexander Mense Security Co-chair | . | Trish Williams Security Co-chair | |||
x | Christopher Shawn Security Co-chair | x | Suzanne Gonzales-Webb | x | Mike Davis | . | David Staggs | |||
x | Diana Proud-Madruga | . | Johnathan Coleman | x | Francisco Jauregui | x | Joe Lamy | |||
. | Theresa Ardal Connor | . | Greg Linden | . | Grahame Grieve | x | Dave Silver | |||
. x | Beth Pumo | . | Jim Kretz | . | Peter Bachman | x | Peter VanLiesdonk] |
Agenda
- (2 min) Roll Call, Agenda Approval
- (5 min) Review and Approval of Minutes November 6, 2018
- (5 min) Update on revision of PASS Audit - Is reconciliation spreadsheet ready for upload? - Mike
- (5 min) Security Harmonization proposal codes approved Some value sets will be proposed in March - Kathleen
- (5 min) v2.9 Change Request related to Confidentiality codes - Kathleen
- (5 min) HL7 v2 to FHIR PSS, v2 to FHIR Spreadsheet for Security - Kathleen
- (5 min) GDPR whitepaper on FHIR Update, reminder of new call schedule - Alex
- (5 min) FHIR Security call update - John
Meeting Minutes
Meeting Chair - Chris Shawn
Meeting Minute Approval - November 6, 2018
- (Motion to approve (Suzanne/Kathleen): Vote: objections/abstentions: none;
((Suzanne to add harmonization proposal link))
Update on PASS Audit reconciliation
- last understood was that reconciliation comments were completed, and we could ask for withdrawal
- Kathleen brought up that Bernd B wants to see corrections in the document before he withdrawals
- as far as Mike is concerned we should push forward and request withdrawal of negative
- e-mail from Lynn Laakso; there was material due in order to ballot TF4FA; she has listed that one and two have not been published? was this a new requirement...Kathleen asked if this was a new rule? which could be a show stopper...
- we will wait and see what her answer is before proceeding. Current answer is we don't know.
Harmonization codes
- all three proposals were approved; Kathleen is deferring the codes that were not completed to next harmonization
- policy codes have been brought into v2
- next harmonization
- there were changes in the xx ballot to update confidentiality
V2.9 HL7 access proposal
- in chapter 4; want clarification. security labels content is different than found in orders
- two sections which are talking about kind of labs--they were using vocabulary that was close to vocab in v3; which we changed years ago because of a mix of sensitivity and confidentiality--Kathleen proposes that the codes be retired
- recommendation is that they use the ARV segment be used which can point to any part of the lab order for results--removing table from both segments where they currently occur; avoiding conflict, note this is not a controversial issue...strictly clean-up. Rikki Merrick is trying to get into OO agenda to get in publishing of v2.9 clean-up
- question on harmonization – (Mike) this is a vocabulary--where does Hl7 specify where these marking are optional or mandatory?... <Kathleen response> no, there is a specific policy; it says what is in the law; so, it’s still an interpretation of the law.
- mike - part of the law 7332; has to do with what we've determined are the handling instructions... HII of the law; he has it from the legal folks, that their interpretations that its a requirement on the recipient not of the VA--or to tell them that such a restriction exists
- if 7332 hadn't been specified for just health; there is something in the law (if specified)… then
(listen to recording)
- in other words, it’s up to the implementer to decide on the language
HL7 2 to FHIR PSS
- standards approach mapping from v2 to FHIR
- each of the datatypes;
- effort is underway (meetings every other week); the mapping between chapter 9 con segment and the FHIR consent and contract
- important in regard to the transform; having capability from going from one set to another. i.e. get transform set into FHIR (confirm)
GDPR whitepaper
- no meeting this week
- next meeting is 11/19 - noon (Monday)
FHIR Security call update
- Short call today; went over v2 FHIR
- current build is frozen
- because of HIMSS several subjects are up in the air
- September care planning are not going to be at HIMSS--and not be at the January WGM--this will lower about ability to move with security and consent--we will still be able to do work with break glass
additional agenda items?
None
Motion t adjourn (Kathleen) Meeting adjourned at 1320 Arizona Time --Suzannegw (talk) 15:20, 13 November 2018 (EST) Temporary Recording: https:fccdl.in/yN1FTQeUV