This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
November 13, 2018 Security Conference Call
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Attendees
x | Member Name | x | Member Name | x | Member Name | x | Member Name | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | John Moehrke Security Co-chair | x | Kathleen Connor Security Co-chair | x | Alexander Mense Security Co-chair | . | Trish Williams Security Co-chair | |||
x | Christopher Shawn Security Co-chair | x | Suzanne Gonzales-Webb | x | Mike Davis | . | David Staggs | |||
x | Diana Proud-Madruga | . | Johnathan Coleman | x | Francisco Jauregui | x | Joe Lamy | |||
. | Theresa Ardal Connor | . | Greg Linden | . | Grahame Grieve | x | Dave Silver | |||
. x | Beth Pumo | . | Jim Kretz | . | Peter Bachman | x | Peter VanLiesdonk] |
Agenda
- (2 min) Roll Call, Agenda Approval
- (5 min) Review and Approval of Minutes November 6, 2018
- (5 min) Update on revision of PASS Audit - Is reconciliation spreadsheet ready for upload? - Mike
- (5 min) Security Harmonization proposal codes approved Some value sets will be proposed in March - Kathleen
- (5 min) v2.9 Change Request related to Confidentiality codes - Kathleen
- (5 min) HL7 v2 to FHIR PSS, v2 to FHIR Spreadsheet for Security - Kathleen
- (5 min) GDPR whitepaper on FHIR Update, reminder of new call schedule - Alex
- (5 min) FHIR Security call update - John
Meeting Minutes
Meeting Chair - Chris Shawn
Meeting Minute Approval - November 6, 2018
- (Motion to approve (Suzanne/Kathleen): Vote: objections/abstentions: none;
((Suzanne to add harmonization proposal link))
Update on PASS Audit reconciliation
- last understood was that reconciliation comments were completed, and we could ask for withdrawal
- Kathleen brought up that Bernd B wants to see corrections in the document before he withdrawals
- as far as Mike is concerned we should push forward and request withdrawal of negative
- e-mail from Lynn Laakso; there was material due in order to ballot TF4FA; she has listed that one and two have not been published? was this a new requirement...Kathleen asked if this was a new rule? which could be a show stopper...
- we will wait and see what her answer is before proceeding. Current answer is we don't know.
Harmonization codes
- all three proposals were approved; Kathleen is deferring the codes that were not completed to next harmonization
- policy codes have been brought into v2
- next harmonization
- there were changes in the xx ballot to update confidentiality
V2.9 HL7 access proposal
- in chapter 4; want clarification. security labels content is different than found in orders
- two sections which are talking about kind of labs--they were using vocabulary that was close to vocab in v3; which we changed years ago because of a mix of sensitivity and confidentiality--Kathleen proposes that the codes be retired
- recommendation is that they use the ARV segment be used which can point to any part of the lab order for results--removing table from both segments where they currently occur; avoiding conflict, note this is not a controversial issue...strictly clean-up. Rikki Merrick is trying to get into OO agenda to get in publishing of v2.9 clean-up
- question on harmonization – (Mike) this is a vocabulary--where does Hl7 specify where these marking are optional or mandatory?... <Kathleen response> no, there is a specific policy; it says what is in the law; so, it’s still an interpretation of the law.
- mike - part of the law 7332; has to do with what we've determined are the handling instructions... HII of the law; he has it from the legal folks, that their interpretations that its a requirement on the recipient not of the VA--or to tell them that such a restriction exists
- if 7332 hadn't been specified for just health; there is something in the law (if specified)… then
(listen to recording)
- in other words, it’s up to the implementer to decide on the language
HL7 2 to FHIR PSS
- standards approach mapping from v2 to FHIR
- each of the datatypes;
- effort is underway (meetings every other week); the mapping between chapter 9 con segment and the FHIR consent and contract
- important in regard to the transform; having capability from going from one set to another. i.e. get transform set into FHIR (confirm)
GDPR whitepaper
- no meeting this week
- next meeting is 11/19 - noon (Monday)
FHIR Security call update
- Short call today; went over v2 FHIR
- current build is frozen
- because of HIMSS several subjects are up in the air
- September care planning are not going to be at HIMSS--and not be at the January WGM--this will lower about ability to move with security and consent--we will still be able to do work with break glass
additional agenda items?
None
Motion t adjourn (Kathleen) Meeting adjourned at 1320 Arizona Time --Suzannegw (talk) 15:20, 13 November 2018 (EST) Temporary Recording: https:fccdl.in/yN1FTQeUV