This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Condition/Diagnosis/Problem (QDM)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
FEisenberg (talk | contribs) |
FEisenberg (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This QDM to QI Core Mapping for the QDM Datatype "Diagnosis" was updated 3 April 2018 based on discussion in the CQI WG on March 30, 2018. <br> | This QDM to QI Core Mapping for the QDM Datatype "Diagnosis" was updated 3 April 2018 based on discussion in the CQI WG on March 30, 2018. <br> | ||
QDM defines Condition/Diagnosis/Problem as a practitioner’s identification of a patient’s disease, illness, injury, or condition. This category contains a single datatype to represent all of these concepts: Diagnosis. A practitioner determines the diagnosis by means of examination, diagnostic test results, patient history, and/or family history. Diagnoses are usually considered unfavorable, but may also represent neutral or favorable conditions that affect a patient’s plan of care (e.g., pregnancy). | QDM defines Condition/Diagnosis/Problem as a practitioner’s identification of a patient’s disease, illness, injury, or condition. This category contains a single datatype to represent all of these concepts: Diagnosis. A practitioner determines the diagnosis by means of examination, diagnostic test results, patient history, and/or family history. Diagnoses are usually considered unfavorable, but may also represent neutral or favorable conditions that affect a patient’s plan of care (e.g., pregnancy). | ||
| − | + | <br> | |
| + | __FORCETOC__ | ||
| + | ==Condition/Diagnosis/Problem== | ||
{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" | {|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" | ||
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''QDM Attribute''' | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''QDM Attribute''' | ||
Revision as of 13:49, 9 April 2018
Back to Harmonization of Health Quality Information Models Page
This QDM to QI Core Mapping for the QDM Datatype "Diagnosis" was updated 3 April 2018 based on discussion in the CQI WG on March 30, 2018.
QDM defines Condition/Diagnosis/Problem as a practitioner’s identification of a patient’s disease, illness, injury, or condition. This category contains a single datatype to represent all of these concepts: Diagnosis. A practitioner determines the diagnosis by means of examination, diagnostic test results, patient history, and/or family history. Diagnoses are usually considered unfavorable, but may also represent neutral or favorable conditions that affect a patient’s plan of care (e.g., pregnancy).
Contents
Condition/Diagnosis/Problem
| QDM Attribute | QI Core Metadata Element | Comment |
| Diagnosis | Condition (the .clinicalstatus metadata allows conformance to the specific QDM datatype context) | QDM defaults the status to active and prevalence period provides the evidence of activity. |
| Prevalence Period | Condition.onset[x], OR Condition.asserted | Use whichever is the earlier date. QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR for start of Prevalence Period |
| Condition.abatement[x] | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR for end of Prevalence Period | |
| Anatomical Location Site | Condition.bodySite | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR |
| Severity | Condition.severity | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR |
| Code | Condition.code | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR |
| Author dateTime | FHIR Provenance.recorded | FHIR provenance addressed author time, Condition.assertedDate may be closer to the onset of the QDM Prevalence Period. Consider - the software may default assertedDate to the date entered requiring manual editing to enter a different date. Further, does it reflect the date the assertion is made or the date the patient asserted that the condition began? Seeking guidance - due to potential ambiguity, should QDM map to FHIR provenance? |
| id | Condition.id | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR |
| Source | Condition.asserter | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR |
