This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Condition/Diagnosis/Problem (QDM)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
FEisenberg (talk | contribs) |
FEisenberg (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Harmonization_of_Health_Quality_Information_models Back to Harmonization of Health Quality Information Models Page] | + | [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Harmonization_of_Health_Quality_Information_models Back to Harmonization of Health Quality Information Models Page]<br> |
+ | QDM defines Condition/Diagnosis/Problem as a practitioner’s identification of a patient’s disease, illness, injury, or condition. This category contains a single datatype to represent all of these concepts: Diagnosis. A practitioner determines the diagnosis by means of examination, diagnostic test results, patient history, and/or family history. Diagnoses are usually considered unfavorable, but may also represent neutral or favorable conditions that affect a patient’s plan of care (e.g., pregnancy). | ||
+ | |||
{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" | {|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" | ||
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''QDM Attribute''' | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''QDM Attribute''' |
Revision as of 12:37, 29 March 2018
Back to Harmonization of Health Quality Information Models Page
QDM defines Condition/Diagnosis/Problem as a practitioner’s identification of a patient’s disease, illness, injury, or condition. This category contains a single datatype to represent all of these concepts: Diagnosis. A practitioner determines the diagnosis by means of examination, diagnostic test results, patient history, and/or family history. Diagnoses are usually considered unfavorable, but may also represent neutral or favorable conditions that affect a patient’s plan of care (e.g., pregnancy).
QDM Attribute | QI Core Metadata Element | Comment |
Diagnosis | Condition (the .clinicalstatus metadata allows conformance to the specific QDM datatype context) | QDM defaults the status to active and prevalence period provides the evidence of activity. |
Prevalence Period | Condition.onset[x] | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR for start of Prevalence Period |
Condition.abatement[x] | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR for end of Prevalence Period | |
Anatomical Location Site | Condition.bodySite | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR |
Severity | Condition.severity | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR |
Code | Condition.code | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR |
Author dateTime | Condition.assertedDate | FHIR provenance addressed author time, Condition.assertedDate may be closer to the onset of the QDM Prevalence Period. Consider - the software may default assertedDate to the date entered requiring manual editing to enter a different date. Further, does it reflect the date the assertion is made or the date the patient asserted that the condition began? Seeking guidance - due to potential ambiguity, should QDM map to FHIR provenance? |
id | Condition.id | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR |
Source | Condition.asserter | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR |