This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Condition/Diagnosis/Problem (QDM)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
FEisenberg (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''QDM Attribute''' | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''QI Core Metadata...") |
FEisenberg (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Comment''' | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Comment''' | ||
|-valign="top" | |-valign="top" | ||
− | | | + | |
− | | | + | | row1cell1 | Diagnosis |
− | ||QDM defaults the status to active and prevalence period provides the evidence of activity. | + | | row1cell2 | Condition (the .clinicalstatus metadata allows conformance to the specific QDM datatype context) |
+ | | row1cell3 | QDM defaults the status to active and prevalence period provides the evidence of activity. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | row2cell1 | Prevalence Period | ||
+ | | row2cell2 | Condition.onset[x] | ||
+ | | row2cell3 | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR for start of Prevalence Period | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | row2cell1 | | ||
+ | | row2cell2 | Condition.abatement[x] | ||
+ | | row2cell3 | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR for end of Prevalence Period | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | row2cell1 | Anatomical Location Site | ||
+ | | row2cell2 | Condition.bodySite | ||
+ | | row2cell3 | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | row2cell1 | Severity | ||
+ | | row2cell2 | Condition.severity | ||
+ | | row2cell3 | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | row2cell1 | Code | ||
+ | | row2cell2 | Condition.code | ||
+ | | row2cell3 | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | row2cell1 | Author dateTime | ||
+ | | row2cell2 | Condition.assertedDate | ||
+ | | row2cell3 | FHIR provenance addressed author time, Condition.assertedDate may be closer to the onset of the QDM Prevalence Period. Consider - the software may default assertedDate to the date entered requiring manual editing to enter a different date. Further, does it reflect the date the assertion is made or the date the patient asserted that the condition began? Seeking guidance - due to potential ambiguity, should QDM map to FHIR provenance? | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | + | | row2cell1 | id | |
+ | | row2cell2 | Condition.id | ||
+ | | row2cell3 | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 11:56, 29 March 2018
QDM Attribute | QI Core Metadata Element | Comment |
Diagnosis | Condition (the .clinicalstatus metadata allows conformance to the specific QDM datatype context) | QDM defaults the status to active and prevalence period provides the evidence of activity. |
Prevalence Period | Condition.onset[x] | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR for start of Prevalence Period |
Condition.abatement[x] | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR for end of Prevalence Period | |
Anatomical Location Site | Condition.bodySite | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR |
Severity | Condition.severity | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR |
Code | Condition.code | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR |
Author dateTime | Condition.assertedDate | FHIR provenance addressed author time, Condition.assertedDate may be closer to the onset of the QDM Prevalence Period. Consider - the software may default assertedDate to the date entered requiring manual editing to enter a different date. Further, does it reflect the date the assertion is made or the date the patient asserted that the condition began? Seeking guidance - due to potential ambiguity, should QDM map to FHIR provenance? |
id | Condition.id | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR |