This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "2017-11-08 SGB Conference Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Agenda) |
|||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
| || Ken McCaslin | | || Ken McCaslin | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Rik Smithies | + | |Regrets || Rik Smithies |
|- | |- | ||
| || Sandy Stuart | | || Sandy Stuart | ||
Revision as of 14:57, 8 November 2017
back to Standards Governance Board main page
| HL7 SGB Minutes |
Date: 2017-11-08 Time: 10:00 AM Eastern | ||
| Facilitator | Paul/Calvin | Note taker(s) | Anne |
| Attendee | Name
| ||
| Calvin Beebe | |||
| Lorraine Constable | |||
| Russ Hamm | |||
| Tony Julian | |||
| Paul Knapp | |||
| Austin Kreisler | |||
| Wayne Kubick | |||
| Thom Kuhn | |||
| Ken McCaslin | |||
| Regrets | Rik Smithies | ||
| Sandy Stuart | |||
| Quorum: Chair + 4 | |||
Agenda
- Agenda review
- Approve Minutes of 2017-10-25_SGB_Conference_Call
- Action Items
- Review GOM with respect to where SGB and precepts should be reflected
- Recommend to TSC to work with CTO on architecture and tooling strategy to support the work of the committees in following the precepts
- Ask Vocab to approve a motion that it was the WG’s intention in R3 for the Expansion profile to be balloted as STU. If PA has not documented approval, send them the same message
- Paul to verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient
- Discussion Topics
- Finish review of mixed ballot content precept
- Precept implementation strategy
- Backwards compatibility consistency and definition across families
- Precepts to Develop
- Parking Lot
- Review Publishing M&C updates regarding dual roles
- How do we deal with making sure that WGs involve those whose content domain they’re touching? (CIMI and Pharmacy and Lab models)
- Review Mission and Charter
- Handling situations where two documents come out of one project
- FHIR Product Director Position Description: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB
- Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities
- Levels of standards
- Separation of concerns
- Ownership of content
- ISM
- Ask methodology groups to define how the definition of substantive change applies to their product family; management groups must then operationalize
Minutes
Meeting Outcomes
| Actions
|
| Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2017 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved
