This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "2017-10-18 SGB Conference Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Agenda) |
(→Agenda) |
||
Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
***Complete; is on 2017-10-23 TSC agenda | ***Complete; is on 2017-10-23 TSC agenda | ||
*Discussion Topics | *Discussion Topics | ||
+ | **SGB to review concept of liaison role to SGB (issue from TSC review of [https://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/13994/15795/CIMIMG.docx CIMI M&C]) | ||
**Finish review of mixed ballot content precept | **Finish review of mixed ballot content precept | ||
**Precept implementation strategy | **Precept implementation strategy | ||
**Backwards compatibility consistency and definition across families | **Backwards compatibility consistency and definition across families | ||
− | * | + | *Precepts to Develop: |
**SGB to produce a precept requiring that, in order to publish a specification, it has to be conformant to any harmonization patterns that HL7 has published | **SGB to produce a precept requiring that, in order to publish a specification, it has to be conformant to any harmonization patterns that HL7 has published | ||
+ | **State Machine Alignment | ||
**How groups are to interact with Publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc. WGs | **How groups are to interact with Publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc. WGs | ||
**Engaging the implementer community in the consideration of changes as artifacts mature | **Engaging the implementer community in the consideration of changes as artifacts mature | ||
Line 103: | Line 105: | ||
**Management groups must establish in writing a refinement of examples that adhere to the definition of substantive change that apply to their product family. Must monitor, audit, and measure conformance to the definition of substantive change. | **Management groups must establish in writing a refinement of examples that adhere to the definition of substantive change that apply to their product family. Must monitor, audit, and measure conformance to the definition of substantive change. | ||
**The addition of new tools (with EST) | **The addition of new tools (with EST) | ||
− | + | **Managing unresponsive parties in PSS approval process | |
+ | **Vocabulary | ||
+ | **Training WGs in CDA methodology and management principles | ||
+ | **Vitality Assessment | ||
*Parking Lot | *Parking Lot | ||
+ | **Review Publishing M&C updates regarding dual roles | ||
+ | **How do we deal with making sure that WGs involve those whose content domain they’re touching? (CIMI and Pharmacy and Lab models) | ||
+ | **Review Mission and Charter | ||
+ | **Handling situations where two documents come out of one project | ||
+ | **[http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=FHIR_Product_Director_Page FHIR Product Director Position Description]: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB | ||
+ | **Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities | ||
+ | **Levels of standards | ||
+ | **Separation of concerns | ||
+ | **Ownership of content | ||
+ | **ISM | ||
+ | **Ask methodology groups to define how the definition of substantive change applies to their product family; management groups must then operationalize | ||
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== |
Revision as of 20:44, 17 October 2017
back to Standards Governance Board main page
HL7 SGB Minutes |
Date: 2017-MM-DD Time: 10:00 AM Eastern | ||
Facilitator | Paul/Calvin | Note taker(s) | Anne |
Attendee | Name
| ||
Calvin Beebe | |||
Lorraine Constable | |||
Russ Hamm | |||
Tony Julian | |||
Paul Knapp | |||
Austin Kreisler | |||
Wayne Kubick | |||
Thom Kuhn | |||
Ken McCaslin | |||
Rik Smithies | |||
Sandy Stuart | |||
Quorum: Chair + 4 |
Agenda
- Agenda review
- Approve Minutes of 2017-10-11_SGB_Conference_Call
- Action Items
- Review GOM with respect to where SGB and precepts should be reflected
- Recommend to TSC to work with CTO on architecture and tooling strategy to support the work of the committees in following the precepts
- Schedule joint meeting with FGB for precept review
- Anne to invite EST cochairs, David, and Laura to 2017-10-25 call
- Complete
- Ask Vocab to approve a motion that it was the WG’s intention in R3 for the Expansion profile to be balloted as STU. If PA has not documented approval, send them the same message
- Paul to verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient
- Anne to invite Linda and Andrew to Friday's CDAMG call as provisional candidates awaiting confirmation from the TSC
- Complete
- Anne to alert Wayne to bring to TSC on Monday
- Complete; is on 2017-10-23 TSC agenda
- Anne to add Life Cycle Management Strategy to TSC agenda
- Complete; is on 2017-10-23 TSC agenda
- Discussion Topics
- SGB to review concept of liaison role to SGB (issue from TSC review of CIMI M&C)
- Finish review of mixed ballot content precept
- Precept implementation strategy
- Backwards compatibility consistency and definition across families
- Precepts to Develop:
- SGB to produce a precept requiring that, in order to publish a specification, it has to be conformant to any harmonization patterns that HL7 has published
- State Machine Alignment
- How groups are to interact with Publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc. WGs
- Engaging the implementer community in the consideration of changes as artifacts mature
- Engagement in large cross-organizational projects
- How management groups document, enforce, and manage the precepts regarding inter-WG participation in artifact creation
- Management groups must establish in writing a refinement of examples that adhere to the definition of substantive change that apply to their product family. Must monitor, audit, and measure conformance to the definition of substantive change.
- The addition of new tools (with EST)
- Managing unresponsive parties in PSS approval process
- Vocabulary
- Training WGs in CDA methodology and management principles
- Vitality Assessment
- Parking Lot
- Review Publishing M&C updates regarding dual roles
- How do we deal with making sure that WGs involve those whose content domain they’re touching? (CIMI and Pharmacy and Lab models)
- Review Mission and Charter
- Handling situations where two documents come out of one project
- FHIR Product Director Position Description: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB
- Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities
- Levels of standards
- Separation of concerns
- Ownership of content
- ISM
- Ask methodology groups to define how the definition of substantive change applies to their product family; management groups must then operationalize
Minutes
Meeting Outcomes
Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2017 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved