This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "CMHAFF call, Thursday, August 31"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "'''ATTENDEES:''' '''AGENDA:''' *Review/Approve specific content changes **DKT11 Any recommendation on a "secure coding" reference? **DKT39 decision on what to do with prov...") |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
**DKT11 Any recommendation on a "secure coding" reference? | **DKT11 Any recommendation on a "secure coding" reference? | ||
**DKT39 decision on what to do with provenance discussion | **DKT39 decision on what to do with provenance discussion | ||
| − | ** | + | **DKT48 Revisit Conditions and Agreements |
| + | **DKT54 Is there a good starting point for a Glossary reference? | ||
| + | **DKT55 Should Windows platform considerations be removed? | ||
*San Diego September HL7 WGM considerations | *San Diego September HL7 WGM considerations | ||
**Review preliminary cMHAFF presentation for September (San Diego) HL7 WGM | **Review preliminary cMHAFF presentation for September (San Diego) HL7 WGM | ||
Revision as of 19:03, 31 August 2017
ATTENDEES:
AGENDA:
- Review/Approve specific content changes
- DKT11 Any recommendation on a "secure coding" reference?
- DKT39 decision on what to do with provenance discussion
- DKT48 Revisit Conditions and Agreements
- DKT54 Is there a good starting point for a Glossary reference?
- DKT55 Should Windows platform considerations be removed?
- San Diego September HL7 WGM considerations
- Review preliminary cMHAFF presentation for September (San Diego) HL7 WGM
- Plan which topics are most in need of discussion for face-to-face time in San Diego
- Nathan: recommend which (if any) criteria from Finland should be added to cMHAFF.
- File:National authorisation criteria of Finnish PHR v2.2 Nokia Translation.xlsx -- FINNISH National Authorisation (Certification) Criteria for PHR (unofficial translation into English) Contains approximately 80 criteria in 6 categories. (NATHAN BOTTS)
