This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "2016-12-30PC CIMI POC Call Minutes"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 47: Line 47:
 
|-
 
|-
 
<!-- ********add attendee information here *********-->
 
<!-- ********add attendee information here *********-->
| || Richard Esmond
+
| y || Susan Campbell
 
|colspan="2"| PenRad
 
|colspan="2"| PenRad
 
|-
 
|-
| || Galen Mulrooney
+
| y || Galen Mulrooney
 
|colspan="2"| JP Systems
 
|colspan="2"| JP Systems
 
|-
 
|-
| || Jay Lyle
+
| y || Jay Lyle
 
|colspan="2"| JP Systems / VA
 
|colspan="2"| JP Systems / VA
 
|-
 
|-
| || Harold Solbrig
+
| y || Steve Hufnagel
 
|colspan="2"| Mayo
 
|colspan="2"| Mayo
 
|-
 
|-
| || Susan Matney
+
| y || Susan Matney
 
|colspan="2"| Intermountain
 
|colspan="2"| Intermountain
 
|-
 
|-
Line 119: Line 119:
  
 
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/>
 
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/>
 
+
* Reviewed high-level CIMI model for Steve
 +
* Reviewed foundational requirement as above: no argument
 +
* Tried to explain slide deck 2, slide 4.
 +
** Apparently this is very hard to understand. Jay will work on that.
 +
** And we need a more actionable agenda for next week.
  
 
===Meeting Outcomes===
 
===Meeting Outcomes===

Latest revision as of 16:17, 30 December 2016

Back to PC CIMI POC Minutes

Minutes Template

Meeting Information

HL7 PC-CIMI-POC Meeting Minutes

Location: Phone

Date: 2016-12-30
Time: 10:00-11:00 ET
Facilitator Jay Lyle Note taker(s) Jay Lyle
Attendee Name Affiliation


y Susan Campbell PenRad
y Galen Mulrooney JP Systems
y Jay Lyle JP Systems / VA
y Steve Hufnagel Mayo
y Susan Matney Intermountain
Joey Coyle
Gay Dolin
Ash Davison Intermountain
Laura Heerman Langford Intermountain
Claude Nanjo
Rob McClure

Agenda

Agenda Topics

  1. review principle requirement
    1. Be able to classify a clinical statement to support rule execution
      1. (e.g., "is-a chest pain finding with context = present in patient now" or "observable HbA1C > 6% OR > 42 mmol/mol with context = present in patient now")
    2. Suggestion that all we need to infer is the observable. Assertions should be modeled as evaluations with value = 'present' or count.
    3. prior thoughts on modeling semantics:
      1. Semantics slide 1: looking for alignment in archetype. volatile but concrete
      2. Semantics slide 2: stepping back. not concrete, but should be more stable.
  2. review ballot alignment with LOINC

Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:

  • Reviewed high-level CIMI model for Steve
  • Reviewed foundational requirement as above: no argument
  • Tried to explain slide deck 2, slide 4.
    • Apparently this is very hard to understand. Jay will work on that.
    • And we need a more actionable agenda for next week.

Meeting Outcomes

Actions
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items

© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.