This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "HL7 FHIR Security 2016-6-21"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
JohnMoehrke (talk | contribs) (Created page with "==Call Logistics== Weekly: '''Tuesday at 05:00 EST''' (2 PM PST) Conference Audio: '''770-657-9270,''' Access: '''845692'' '''Join online meeting: https://meet.RTC.VA.GOV/...") |
JohnMoehrke (talk | contribs) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Weekly: | Weekly: | ||
'''Tuesday at 05:00 EST''' (2 PM PST) | '''Tuesday at 05:00 EST''' (2 PM PST) | ||
− | + | Conference Audio: '''770-657-9270,''' Access: '''845692'' | |
− | Conference Audio: '''770-657-9270,''' Access: '''845692'' | + | '''Join online meeting: https://meet.RTC.VA.GOV/suzanne.gonzales-webb/67LLFDYV |
− | + | ''If you are having difficulty joining, please try: | |
− | '''Join online meeting: https://meet.RTC.VA.GOV/suzanne.gonzales-webb/67LLFDYV | + | https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/520841173 |
− | + | ''' ''Please be aware that teleconference meetings are recorded to assist with creating the meeting minutes'' ''' | |
− | ''If you are having difficulty joining, please try: | ||
− | |||
− | https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/520841173 | ||
− | |||
− | ''' ''Please be aware that teleconference meetings are recorded to assist with creating the meeting minutes'' ''' | ||
[[HL7 FHIR security topics|Back to HL7 FHIR security topics]] | [[HL7 FHIR security topics|Back to HL7 FHIR security topics]] | ||
Line 22: | Line 17: | ||
|| x||[mailto:john.moehrke@ge.med.com John Moehrke] Security Co-Chair | || x||[mailto:john.moehrke@ge.med.com John Moehrke] Security Co-Chair | ||
||||x||[mailto:Kathleen_Connor@comcast.net Kathleen Connor] Security Co-Chair | ||||x||[mailto:Kathleen_Connor@comcast.net Kathleen Connor] Security Co-Chair | ||
− | |||| | + | ||||x||[mailto:suzanne.webb@engilitycorp.com Suzanne Gonzales-Webb] CBCC Co-Chair |
|- | |- | ||
|| .||[mailto:gary.dickinson@ehr-standards.com Gary Dickinson] EHR Co-Chair | || .||[mailto:gary.dickinson@ehr-standards.com Gary Dickinson] EHR Co-Chair | ||
Line 29: | Line 24: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|| .||[mailto:rgelzer@provider-resources.com Reed Gelzer] RM-ES Lead | || .||[mailto:rgelzer@provider-resources.com Reed Gelzer] RM-ES Lead | ||
− | |||| | + | ||||.||[mailto:gfm@securityrs.com Glen Marshal] |
||||.||[mailto:Galen.Mulrooney@JPSys.com Galen Mulrooney] | ||||.||[mailto:Galen.Mulrooney@JPSys.com Galen Mulrooney] | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | || | + | || x||[mailto:dsilver@electrosoft-inc.com Dave Silver] |
||||x||[mailto:robert.horn@agfa.com Rob Horn] | ||||x||[mailto:robert.horn@agfa.com Rob Horn] | ||
||||.||[mailto:Judith.Fincher@va.gov Judy Fincher] | ||||.||[mailto:Judith.Fincher@va.gov Judy Fincher] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|| x|| [mailto:Diana.Proud-Madruga@engilitycorp.com Diana Proud-Madruga] | || x|| [mailto:Diana.Proud-Madruga@engilitycorp.com Diana Proud-Madruga] | ||
− | |||| | + | ||||x|| [mailto:Beth.Pumo@kp.org Beth Pumo] |
||||.|| [mailto:oliver@lawless.co Oliver Lawless] | ||||.|| [mailto:oliver@lawless.co Oliver Lawless] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|| .|| [mailto:rdieterle@enablecare.us Bob Dieterle] | || .|| [mailto:rdieterle@enablecare.us Bob Dieterle] | ||
− | |||| | + | ||||x|| [mailto:mario.hyland@aegis.net Mario Hyland] |
||||.|| [mailto:joe.lamy@aegis.net Joe Lamy] | ||||.|| [mailto:joe.lamy@aegis.net Joe Lamy] | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | || | + | || .|| [mailto:richard.grow@va.gov Rick Grow] |
− | ||||.|| [mailto:Richard Etterma] | + | ||||.|| [mailto: Richard Etterma] |
− | ||||.|| [mailto:Wayne Kubic] | + | ||||.|| [mailto: Wayne Kubic] |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 54: | Line 49: | ||
* approval of agenda | * approval of agenda | ||
* approval of the [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=HL7_FHIR_Security_2016-6-14 June 14, 2016 minutes] | * approval of the [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=HL7_FHIR_Security_2016-6-14 June 14, 2016 minutes] | ||
+ | * FHIR spec was updated from last weeks approved CPs, so please review for mistakes. | ||
* Update on action items | * Update on action items | ||
* Discussion around _confidentiality code vocabulary. | * Discussion around _confidentiality code vocabulary. | ||
Line 81: | Line 77: | ||
**[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=6303 6303] Add Record Lifecycle Events to AuditEventObjectLifecycle Set (Gary Dickinson) None | **[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=6303 6303] Add Record Lifecycle Events to AuditEventObjectLifecycle Set (Gary Dickinson) None | ||
− | * Prepare for a block vote for next week -- | + | * Prepare for a block vote for next week -- |
==Minutes== | ==Minutes== | ||
+ | * John Moehrke chair | ||
+ | * approval of agenda - Glen/Rob : unanimous | ||
+ | * approval of the [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=HL7_FHIR_Security_2016-6-14 June 14, 2016 minutes] - Glen/Rob : unanimous | ||
+ | * FHIR spec was updated from last weeks approved CPs, so please review for mistakes. | ||
+ | * Update on action items | ||
+ | * Discussion around _confidentiality code vocabulary. | ||
+ | **[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=9176 9176] Security-Labels page for _confidentialiy points at all "Confidentiality" codes, not just _confidentiality. (John Moehrke) None | ||
+ | ** This is fixed now. http://hl7-fhir.github.io/v3/ConfidentialityClassification/vs.html -- Need to find prior notes where we agreed this needed to be fixed, and close it based on that meeting. Else we can vote in future block vote. | ||
+ | ** Temporary fix, Grahame owns the longer term and wider problem with Vocabulary wg | ||
+ | *9563 -- assigned to Kathleen, to work with Rob -- Following the discussion in the CP | ||
+ | **[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=9563 9563] Add onBehalfOf to Signature datatype () | ||
+ | ** Edited on the call the Signature datatype to be submitted as 'pre-applied' in preparation for future vote. | ||
+ | ** updated CP also with text Rob provided. | ||
+ | * Discussion with Mario on testing | ||
+ | ** Kathleen would like to focus on the Financial use-case | ||
+ | *** Mario is concerned that the financial use-case might be not mature enough, and no have the broadest representation. Indicating that the percentage of connectathon participants is small compared to others | ||
+ | *** John I am concerned this is too focused of a set of people. Meaning we don't get new players. I do think that Financial should include use of Provenance. So might we focus Provenamce on Financial? | ||
+ | ** John would like to focus on Lab use-case | ||
+ | *** John - I want a significant use-case (so not Patient) that stands on its own. Meaning people want to test to that use-case alone (Financial also meets these two criteria). | ||
+ | ** We agree that the addition of AuditEvent testing would be an additional layer, not a mandatory part of the fundamental use-case. (Seems someone has indicated that we wanted it to be mandatory, and Grahame has pushed back. We don't want to be mandatory (yet)) |
Latest revision as of 12:58, 22 June 2016
Contents
Call Logistics
Weekly: Tuesday at 05:00 EST (2 PM PST)
Conference Audio: 770-657-9270,' Access: 845692 Join online meeting: https://meet.RTC.VA.GOV/suzanne.gonzales-webb/67LLFDYV If you are having difficulty joining, please try: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/520841173 Please be aware that teleconference meetings are recorded to assist with creating the meeting minutes
Back to HL7 FHIR security topics
Attendees
Member Name | Member Name | Member Name | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x | John Moehrke Security Co-Chair | x | Kathleen Connor Security Co-Chair | x | Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-Chair | |||
. | Gary Dickinson EHR Co-Chair | . | Johnathan ColemanCBCC Co-Chair | . | Mike Davis | |||
. | Reed Gelzer RM-ES Lead | . | Glen Marshal | . | Galen Mulrooney | |||
x | Dave Silver | x | Rob Horn | . | Judy Fincher | |||
x | Diana Proud-Madruga | x | Beth Pumo | . | Oliver Lawless | |||
. | Bob Dieterle | x | Mario Hyland | . | Joe Lamy | |||
. | Rick Grow | . | [mailto: Richard Etterma] | . | [mailto: Wayne Kubic] |
Agenda
- Roll;
- approval of agenda
- approval of the June 14, 2016 minutes
- FHIR spec was updated from last weeks approved CPs, so please review for mistakes.
- Update on action items
- Discussion around _confidentiality code vocabulary.
- 9176 Security-Labels page for _confidentialiy points at all "Confidentiality" codes, not just _confidentiality. (John Moehrke) None
- Seems this might be fixed now? http://hl7-fhir.github.io/v3/ConfidentialityClassification/vs.html
- do we need an update to HCS page?
- 9563 -- assigned to Kathleen, to work with Rob -- Following the discussion in the CP
- 9563 Add onBehalfOf to Signature datatype ()
- 9564 -- assigned to John -- following the discussion in the CP
- 9564 Should FHIR AuditEvent resource include DICOM extension of ATNA Audit log message ? ()
- 7568 -- assigned to Kathleen, seems this should be satisfid by 9840? -- following the discussion in the CP
- 7568 2015May core #859 - How are agent and activity linked? ()
- 3318 -- assigned to Rick to work with Mike -- following the discussion in the CP
- 3318 Clarify how to use RBAC and ABAC using FHIR ()
- 9042, 9043, 9052 -- assigned to Kathleen, she has the XML almost ready to go
- 9167 -- assigned to John, only creating an example AuditEvent -- following the discussion in the CP
- 9167 AuditEvent needs to make more obvious how to record a break-glass event ()
- 9996 -- assigned to Glen -- following the discussion in the CP
- 9996 Using Provenance resource to annotate content derived from non-FHIR sources ()
- FMM evaluation vs desire - We picked 4 last week -- We might want to re-evaluate to level 3. As level 4 means we would need to work hard to get "complete" testing tools and procedures at 100% of functionality. I think we should only target getting some testing ready.
- Discussion with Mario on getting prepared for next connectathon
- What use-case should we focus on? (Lab vs Financial vs Patient)
- Discussion around Record Lifecycle events (6303)? Are we going to support this? Are the vocabulary done yet? (Gary will join)
- 6303 Add Record Lifecycle Events to AuditEventObjectLifecycle Set (Gary Dickinson) None
- Prepare for a block vote for next week --
Minutes
- John Moehrke chair
- approval of agenda - Glen/Rob : unanimous
- approval of the June 14, 2016 minutes - Glen/Rob : unanimous
- FHIR spec was updated from last weeks approved CPs, so please review for mistakes.
- Update on action items
- Discussion around _confidentiality code vocabulary.
- 9176 Security-Labels page for _confidentialiy points at all "Confidentiality" codes, not just _confidentiality. (John Moehrke) None
- This is fixed now. http://hl7-fhir.github.io/v3/ConfidentialityClassification/vs.html -- Need to find prior notes where we agreed this needed to be fixed, and close it based on that meeting. Else we can vote in future block vote.
- Temporary fix, Grahame owns the longer term and wider problem with Vocabulary wg
- 9563 -- assigned to Kathleen, to work with Rob -- Following the discussion in the CP
- 9563 Add onBehalfOf to Signature datatype ()
- Edited on the call the Signature datatype to be submitted as 'pre-applied' in preparation for future vote.
- updated CP also with text Rob provided.
- Discussion with Mario on testing
- Kathleen would like to focus on the Financial use-case
- Mario is concerned that the financial use-case might be not mature enough, and no have the broadest representation. Indicating that the percentage of connectathon participants is small compared to others
- John I am concerned this is too focused of a set of people. Meaning we don't get new players. I do think that Financial should include use of Provenance. So might we focus Provenamce on Financial?
- John would like to focus on Lab use-case
- John - I want a significant use-case (so not Patient) that stands on its own. Meaning people want to test to that use-case alone (Financial also meets these two criteria).
- We agree that the addition of AuditEvent testing would be an additional layer, not a mandatory part of the fundamental use-case. (Seems someone has indicated that we wanted it to be mandatory, and Grahame has pushed back. We don't want to be mandatory (yet))
- Kathleen would like to focus on the Financial use-case