This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "20160607 arb minutes"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 25: Line 25:
 
#**Is this a new product? Family? Where does it fit?
 
#**Is this a new product? Family? Where does it fit?
 
#Other business and planning
 
#Other business and planning
#*Conformance Testing for ONC
 
 
#Adjournment
 
#Adjournment
  
Line 35: Line 34:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| width="10%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Facilitator'''
 
| width="10%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Facilitator'''
| width="35%" colspan="1" align="left"|[[User:Ajulian | Julian, Tony]]/[[User:Lconstab |Constable, Lorraine]]   
+
| width="35%" colspan="1" align="left"|[[User:Ajulian | Julian, Tony]]
 
| width="10%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Note taker(s)'''
 
| width="10%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Note taker(s)'''
| width="30%" colspan="1" align="left"|[[User:Ajulian | Julian, Tony]]//[[User:Lconstab |Constable, Lorraine]]   
+
| width="30%" colspan="1" align="left"|[[User:Ajulian | Julian, Tony]]  
 
|-
 
|-
 
| border="4" cellpadding="1" colspan="4" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|
 
| border="4" cellpadding="1" colspan="4" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|
Line 45: Line 44:
 
|colspan="2"|'''Affiliation'''  
 
|colspan="2"|'''Affiliation'''  
 
|-
 
|-
|.||Bond,Andy           
+
|X||Bond,Andy           
 
|colspan="2"|NEHTA
 
|colspan="2"|NEHTA
 
|-  
 
|-  
|.||[[User:Lconstab |Constable, Lorraine]]     
+
|X||[[User:Lconstab |Constable, Lorraine]]     
 
|colspan="2"|Constable Consulting Inc.
 
|colspan="2"|Constable Consulting Inc.
 
|-  
 
|-  
|.||Dagnall, Bo         
+
|R||Dagnall, Bo         
 
|colspan="2"|HP Enterprise Services
 
|colspan="2"|HP Enterprise Services
 
|-
 
|-
Line 60: Line 59:
 
|colspan="2"| AEGIS
 
|colspan="2"| AEGIS
 
|-
 
|-
|.||[[User:Ajulian | Julian, Tony]]       
+
|X||[[User:Ajulian | Julian, Tony]]       
 
|colspan="2"|Mayo Clinic
 
|colspan="2"|Mayo Clinic
 
|-  
 
|-  
Line 66: Line 65:
 
|colspan="2"| Pknapp Consulting
 
|colspan="2"| Pknapp Consulting
 
|-  
 
|-  
|.||Kubick, Wayne
+
|X||Kubick, Wayne
 
|colspan="2"|HL7 CTO
 
|colspan="2"|HL7 CTO
 
|-
 
|-
|.||[[User:Ployd|Loyd, Patrick ]]
+
|X||[[User:Ployd|Loyd, Patrick ]]
 
|colspan="2"| ICode Solutions
 
|colspan="2"| ICode Solutions
 
|-  
 
|-  
Line 75: Line 74:
 
|colspan="2"|Accenture
 
|colspan="2"|Accenture
 
|-  
 
|-  
|.||Milosevic, Zoran
+
|R||Milosevic, Zoran
 
|colspan="2"|Deontik Pty Ltd
 
|colspan="2"|Deontik Pty Ltd
 
|-
 
|-
|.||Quinn, John       
+
|X||[[User:Astechishin| Stechishin,Andy]]
|colspan="2"|HL7 CTO Emeritus
 
|-
 
|.||[[User:Astechishin| Stechishin,Andy]]
 
 
|colspan="2"|CANA Software and Service Ltd.
 
|colspan="2"|CANA Software and Service Ltd.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|colspan="4" align="center"|Guests             
 
|colspan="4" align="center"|Guests             
 
|-  
 
|-  
|.|| Nelson, Dale
+
|X|| Solbrig, Harold
|colspan="2"| Accenture
+
|colspan="2"| Mayo Clinic
 
|-
 
|-
|.||Grow, Richard
+
|X||Lyle, Jay
|colspan="2"|U.S. Department of Veterans affairs
+
|colspan="2"|Ockham Information Services LLC
 +
|-
 +
|X||Fisher, Karl
 +
|colspan="2"|Dell Services
 
|-
 
|-
 
|.||  
 
|.||  
Line 112: Line 111:
 
|}
 
|}
  
==Minutes==
+
===Minutes===
 +
#Agenda approval
 +
#* Agenda approved by concensus
 +
#Minute Approval
 +
#*'''Motion''' to approve (Andy/Andy B)
 +
#*'''Vote''' 4-0-3
 +
#Methodology (60 minutes)
 +
#*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/arbgeneral/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2F%2Acheckout%2A%2Ftrunk%2FHL7%2520Project%2520Scope%2520Statement%2520v2015.1_CIMI_POC_d20160511.docx CIMI Proof of concept]
 +
#**Jay Lyle: Not a product - product models and other discoveries.
 +
#**Lorraine: It is not clear if it is a mapping artifact, new models - what are the actual artifacts.
 +
#**Jay Lyle: New artifacts
 +
#**Wayne: Checkbox for logical models
 +
#**Lorraine: Not the same as the traditional HL7 Logical models
 +
#**Jay Lyle: Not sure what Logical Models means:
 +
#**Wayne: Lots of models.
 +
#**Harold: General sense they are logical models. Rest of products have formal meaning and definition.
 +
#**Tony: New product?
 +
#**Harold: Not new to us - new from the HL7 Perspective
 +
#**Jay Lyle:  New product, but not new product definition.  An artifact that defines what a CIMI definition is.
 +
#**Andy S: CQL is a new product.
 +
#**Lorraine: Subject to ARB review.  So we don't proliferate what we have already done.
 +
#**Lorraine: The product is not new to CIMI, but to HL7.
 +
#**Jay Lyle: Good question.
 +
#**Andy S: That is what we are all struggling with.
 +
#**Jay Lyle: If there is not an old project model then it is a new one. Doing it now but not as a project.
 +
#**Lorraine: This project is part of doing that definition.  Granularity level of existing models is not the same as the level of the CIMI models.
 +
#**Jay Lyle: Just seeing what fits together.
 +
#**Lorraine: If we said it was a new product what actions does that decision drive?
 +
#**Jay Lyle: I don't have scope or authority to define CIMI within the scope of the project. Should have a discussion between ARB/CIMI/MnM.
 +
#**Andy B: Is a collection of logical models a new product family?  It is work to create a collection, not a single model.  This may be a product family.  In effect the CIMI logical models are part of an independent product line.
 +
#**Jay Lyle: Not product definitions.
 +
#**Andy B: Instance of a models
 +
#**Jay Lyle: Collection of models.
 +
#**Andy B: Hard to not call it a product family - covers a range of product lines - vertical domain of use in healthcare.  Look across pathology ordering the dam is a product in a product line, but V2, V3, FHIR are product families.  CIMI represents a family of logical models.
 +
#**Jay Lyle: Bits of a DAM coordinates into a single model not decomposed is it not a family?
 +
#**Andy B: Not a single model, but a SET that covers various dams.
 +
#**Harold: Single or set is open to interpretation.  If based on the same model there are branches, so is it one or many?
 +
#**Andy B: Same with FHIR - Individual resources, or a collection.
 +
#**Harold: Different Granularity.
 +
#**Jay Lyle: CDA is a product family, implied from implementation guides.
 +
#**Andy B: CDA product is definition of an IG as a product, CDA is a collection of prod based on a product definition.  A single CIMI model is a new product - another kind of logical model, but this is a disservice - it is not really another kind of logical model.  New product family with the expectation that there would be multiple instances under the family.
 +
#**Jay Lyle: My charge is to develop a new Instance.
 +
#**Tony: Further questions?
 +
#**Lorraine:
 +
#***If not a new product, we are done. 
 +
#***How interested is ARB in following the work - how it fits with the rest of the artifacts.
 +
#**Harold: Trying to figure out how it fits - part of our goal.
 +
#**Jay Lyle: Should we check investigative?
 +
#**Lorraine: That does not trigger our review.
 +
#**Andy S: We should follow what the project does. I think it is a new product, if not a new product family.  Merging something from the outside we need to evaluate how it fits in and what it does.  This project should not answer the question.
 +
#**'''Motion''' ARB be co-sponsor of the project, with periodic reports on progress what they are doing and where they are going.  To develop a better understanding how the CIMI artifacts integrate with the current products and families. (Lorraine/Paul)
 +
#**Andy B: Need to look at how we integrate new work groups - need to discuss with TSC, PLA, and PIC.
 +
#**'''Vote''' (4-0-0)
 +
#**Jay Lyle: How periodic should the updates be?
 +
#**Lorraine: At the major points in the project.
 +
#Other business and planning
 +
#* Tony will forward to TSC with recommendation from ARB for approval.
 +
#*Next Week: ISM
 +
#Adjournment
 +
#* Adjourned at 16:40, 7 June 2016 (EDT)
  
 +
([[User talk:Ajulian|talk]]) 16:48, 7 June 2016 (EDT)
  
  
  
 
[[Category:2016 Arb Minutes]]
 
[[Category:2016 Arb Minutes]]

Latest revision as of 20:04, 14 June 2016

ARB - Meeting (Date in Title)

logistics

Teleconferences are held on Tuesday at 4:00pm U.S. Eastern Schedules may be found at HL7.org Conference Call Center


Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.

  1. Join the meeting:
  2. If you cant use voip then capture the PIN from the screen for the above action, then
  • Weekly conference call.
  • For 24/7 customer service please call (844) 844-1322.

Agenda

  1. Call to order
  2. Roll Call
  3. Approval of Agenda and May 31, 2016 Minutes
  4. Governance
  5. Methodology (60 minutes)
  6. Other business and planning
  7. Adjournment

Meeting Information

HL7 ArB Work Group Meeting Minutes

Location: Telcon

Date: 20160531
Time: 4:00pm U.S. Eastern
Facilitator Julian, Tony Note taker(s) Julian, Tony
Attendee Name Affiliation
X Bond,Andy NEHTA
X Constable, Lorraine Constable Consulting Inc.
R Dagnall, Bo HP Enterprise Services
. Hufnagel, Steve ?????
. Hyland, Mario AEGIS
X Julian, Tony Mayo Clinic
. Knapp, Paul Pknapp Consulting
X Kubick, Wayne HL7 CTO
X Loyd, Patrick ICode Solutions
. Lynch, Cecil Accenture
R Milosevic, Zoran Deontik Pty Ltd
X Stechishin,Andy CANA Software and Service Ltd.
Guests
X Solbrig, Harold Mayo Clinic
X Lyle, Jay Ockham Information Services LLC
X Fisher, Karl Dell Services
.
Legend
X Present
. Absent
R Regrets
Quorum Requirements (Co-chair + 3) Met: Yes

Minutes

  1. Agenda approval
    • Agenda approved by concensus
  2. Minute Approval
    • Motion to approve (Andy/Andy B)
    • Vote 4-0-3
  3. Methodology (60 minutes)
    • CIMI Proof of concept
      • Jay Lyle: Not a product - product models and other discoveries.
      • Lorraine: It is not clear if it is a mapping artifact, new models - what are the actual artifacts.
      • Jay Lyle: New artifacts
      • Wayne: Checkbox for logical models
      • Lorraine: Not the same as the traditional HL7 Logical models
      • Jay Lyle: Not sure what Logical Models means:
      • Wayne: Lots of models.
      • Harold: General sense they are logical models. Rest of products have formal meaning and definition.
      • Tony: New product?
      • Harold: Not new to us - new from the HL7 Perspective
      • Jay Lyle: New product, but not new product definition. An artifact that defines what a CIMI definition is.
      • Andy S: CQL is a new product.
      • Lorraine: Subject to ARB review. So we don't proliferate what we have already done.
      • Lorraine: The product is not new to CIMI, but to HL7.
      • Jay Lyle: Good question.
      • Andy S: That is what we are all struggling with.
      • Jay Lyle: If there is not an old project model then it is a new one. Doing it now but not as a project.
      • Lorraine: This project is part of doing that definition. Granularity level of existing models is not the same as the level of the CIMI models.
      • Jay Lyle: Just seeing what fits together.
      • Lorraine: If we said it was a new product what actions does that decision drive?
      • Jay Lyle: I don't have scope or authority to define CIMI within the scope of the project. Should have a discussion between ARB/CIMI/MnM.
      • Andy B: Is a collection of logical models a new product family? It is work to create a collection, not a single model. This may be a product family. In effect the CIMI logical models are part of an independent product line.
      • Jay Lyle: Not product definitions.
      • Andy B: Instance of a models
      • Jay Lyle: Collection of models.
      • Andy B: Hard to not call it a product family - covers a range of product lines - vertical domain of use in healthcare. Look across pathology ordering the dam is a product in a product line, but V2, V3, FHIR are product families. CIMI represents a family of logical models.
      • Jay Lyle: Bits of a DAM coordinates into a single model not decomposed is it not a family?
      • Andy B: Not a single model, but a SET that covers various dams.
      • Harold: Single or set is open to interpretation. If based on the same model there are branches, so is it one or many?
      • Andy B: Same with FHIR - Individual resources, or a collection.
      • Harold: Different Granularity.
      • Jay Lyle: CDA is a product family, implied from implementation guides.
      • Andy B: CDA product is definition of an IG as a product, CDA is a collection of prod based on a product definition. A single CIMI model is a new product - another kind of logical model, but this is a disservice - it is not really another kind of logical model. New product family with the expectation that there would be multiple instances under the family.
      • Jay Lyle: My charge is to develop a new Instance.
      • Tony: Further questions?
      • Lorraine:
        • If not a new product, we are done.
        • How interested is ARB in following the work - how it fits with the rest of the artifacts.
      • Harold: Trying to figure out how it fits - part of our goal.
      • Jay Lyle: Should we check investigative?
      • Lorraine: That does not trigger our review.
      • Andy S: We should follow what the project does. I think it is a new product, if not a new product family. Merging something from the outside we need to evaluate how it fits in and what it does. This project should not answer the question.
      • Motion ARB be co-sponsor of the project, with periodic reports on progress what they are doing and where they are going. To develop a better understanding how the CIMI artifacts integrate with the current products and families. (Lorraine/Paul)
      • Andy B: Need to look at how we integrate new work groups - need to discuss with TSC, PLA, and PIC.
      • Vote (4-0-0)
      • Jay Lyle: How periodic should the updates be?
      • Lorraine: At the major points in the project.
  4. Other business and planning
    • Tony will forward to TSC with recommendation from ARB for approval.
    • Next Week: ISM
  5. Adjournment
    • Adjourned at 16:40, 7 June 2016 (EDT)
(talk) 16:48, 7 June 2016 (EDT)