This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Pressure Ulcer Prevention Questions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Questions
Back to Pressure Ulcer Prevention
ID | Package | Topic | Question | Answer | Status |
1 | Top | Pressure Ulcer | should be an assessment item, not a target of an assessment | yes | Closed |
2 | Top | Pressure Ulcer | Do we need size? | No requests for size | Closed |
3 | Top | Assessment | needs a performer. What attributes? Role, credentials, name? | Closed | |
4 | Top | Assessment | needs an attestor. What attributes? Role, credentials, name? | Closed | |
5 | Top | Assessment Item | Might items be completed by different people? | Yes; see Observation Metadata package | Closed |
6 | Top | Relevant lab | remove | yes | Closed |
7 | Top | Risk Factor | remove | yes | Closed |
8 | Top | Clinical Judgement | attach to assessment; not an item | Closed | |
9 | Skin Inspection | Skin Inspection | need description | drafted; for review in session | Closed |
10 | Skin Inspection | Skin Inspection | does not need site | true | Closed |
11 | Skin Inspection | Temperature | measured, or subjective? | surface, subjective | Closed |
12 | Skin Inspection | Terms | A Temperature value is tagged 'normal' in metadata; does it need that tag in the interface term? | Closed | |
13 | Skin Inspection | Color | How stable are the values? | We assume stable; assess in ballot | Closed |
14 | Medical Condition | Medical Condition | how many questions are there--one, with a hierarchy of answers, or several? | One | Closed |
15 | Medical Condition | Medical Condition | Are these values from the chart? | Information Source now modeled as Observation Metadata | Closed |
16 | Medical Condition | Medical Condition | What is the 'patient-reported active indicator'? Confirmation by the patient that the charted condition is current? | was intended as a link to assessment; out of scope. Delete | Closed |
17 | Medical Condition | History of mental illness | Aren't these all histories? Is this different? | 'hx' removed | Closed |
18 | Medical Condition | Diabetes | what information is needed? | presence | Closed |
19 | Medical Condition | Terms | missing vascular diseases - NC | added general term | Closed |
20 | Instrument | FDA age group | remove | yes | Closed |
21 | Instrument | age | We'll associate this with the patient, not the instrument | Closed | |
22 | Instrument | age | Two age properties: should be one | Closed | |
23 | Instrument | braden scale | use constraints on the class for age | Closed | |
24 | Instrument | braden scale | data type: coded ordinal? | Closed | |
25 | Adherence | Adherence | Is the plan discrete, or can you adhere to part of it? | We need adherence to parts 2/23 | Closed |
26 | Adherence | Adherence | Is this to be evaluated for each actor, or is one adherence value, with the most important actor, sufficient? | Actors seem to muddy the water: remove. If a family member is the source of information, that's recorded in Observation Metadata. 2/23 | Closed |
27 | Adherence | Terms | Does 'provider' mean 'provider who is not a nurse or home caregiver? What's an SO? Does 'family/caregiver/so' mean any non-provider, or anyone in the home? | Moot, per above direction. | Closed |
28 | Adherence | Terms | These are not specific enough. Where there are specific terms, there are overlap problems with more general terms. 2/23 | drafted | Closed |
29 | Device | Device | how many questions are there--one, with a hierarchy of answers, or several? | one | Closed |
30 | Device | Body Structure | should cardinality be 1:* | drafted | closed |
31 | Device | Body Structure | This should be a class, not an object | Closed | |
32 | Device | Terms | Does Drain Device need classification | left unspecified | closed |
33 | Device | Terms | Change "Peg" to something more general -- G-tube or J-tube | included all 3 | closed |
34 | Nutrition | Weight | Make weight a quantity | Closed | |
35 | Nutrition | Terms | Hydration Status not clear | We need 'hydrated' and 'not'; or perhaps mild & severe dehydration | closed |
36 | Nutrition | Terms | Hydration Factor not clear | Propose removal | closed |
37 | Nutrition | Terms | "Excessive Boniness" seems unusual | removed | closed |
38 | Nutrition | Weight | Why do we need a subjective weight estimation? | left in pending feedback | closed |
39 | Nutrition Management | BMI | BMI is not that useful although I agree it should be collected. What is more useful is weight trend - history of loss/gain in past 30, 90 and 180 days. - NC | added trend value class | Closed |
40 | Medication | Medication | We have the medication name: that should be classified; then classifications won't be necessary further down | Agreed 2/23 | closed |
41 | Medication | Impact | Impact would then be just the impact, not the causative agent | True, though a med may have multiple impacts | Closed |
42 | Medication | Impact | Is impact observed or inferred? If we see a sedative on the list, do we also indicate that we observe AMSP, or is that assumed? | Record the med. The class and impact risk can be inferred from rules; no observation is necessary | Closed |
43 | Medication | Terms | Make sure we have the latest list. Also run by HL7 Pharmacy group | Solicit in ballot | Closed |
44 | Intervention Event | Indicator | What is this? | Delete | Closed |
45 | Intervention Event | Actor | Does the actor need a name, credential, etc, or just a role? | Try modeling on Observation Metadata pattern | Closed |
46 | Intervention Event | Consult | What it the purpose of the Consult? Is this another type of actor, or a reference to advice? | A type of intervention; move to intervention hierarchy | Closed |
47 | Intervention Event | Terms | What it the purpose of the Consult hierarchy? Is there one question or two? | Remodeled as separate act | Closed |
48 | Intervention Event | Interaction | It seems an event may have more than one interaction; if so, the 1:1 cardinality won't work here. Perhaps Type and Status belong on the Intervention, while the interaction and actor belong on the Event. | Remodeled | Closed |
49 | Intervention Event | Terms | Is there a 'cancelled' status? | Need to harmonize states with Event types; see state chart | Closed |
50 | Education | Education | Might this need fuller information, e.g., narrative? | not unless requested | closed |
51 | Education | Terms | How volatile is Method? | These values are examples, not a recommendation for a standard. Use stereotype. | Closed |
52 | Pressure Redistribution | Terms | Should Angle be a quantity? | Yes | Closed |
53 | Pressure Redistribution | Terms | Should Frequency be a quantity? | Yes | Closed |
54 | Pressure Redistribution | Device | Are these devices to avoid? | yes | Closed |
55 | Pressure Redistribution | Avoid | Most of this package is a taxonomy of intervention types; this is a record of a patient-specific property, which will need to be retained across multiple instances of the repositioning intervention. Should it be associated with the patient? | Yes | Closed |
56 | Pressure Redistribution | Terms | What is the intervention for 'Surface' -- 'changed support surface'? | yes | Closed |
57 | Pressure Redistribution | Turning | I'd expect Turning to be a specialization of Positioning, lateral positioning to be another specialization, and not a property of the parent. | incorrect: see new model | Closed |
58 | Pressure Redistribution | Terms | Clarify Position: presumably, 'right' means "on the patient's right side," not "rotated 90 degrees to the right." | ok | Closed |
79 | Pressure Redistribution | Model | Add HOB | Closed | |
80 | Pressure Redistribution | Model | "position" is site-specific: add 'body structure of concern' to the model | ok | Closed |
59 | Support Surface | Product | This would be more useful if we also had the age of the device | Added | Closed |
60 | Support Surface | Bed | Is this relevant? | No | Closed |
61 | Support Surface | Force | Do we measure magnitude, or coefficient of friction? How? | No | Closed |
62 | Support Surface | Force | Is the surface subjected to a force, or does the surface exert a force on the patient? | Moot | Closed |
63 | Support Surface | Force | Specializations: how does this hierarchy help? Ditto for children of Surface. | Moot; deleted | Closed |
64 | Skin Protection | Barrier | The barrier is not a type of intervention; it's used in an intervention | renamed | Closed |
65 | Skin Protection | HOB | Seems like this should be a quantity (degrees) rather than Boolean. If the Positioning class needs a "positions to avoid" view, does this need a "HOB for other clinical reasons" view? | remodeled | Closed |
66 | Skin Protection | Aid, alignment | Is this a record of a specific transfer (not really part of a plan) or an indication that this transfer aid is to be used in future transfers? | yes | Closed |
67 | Skin Protection | Dryness prevention | include barrier substance, e.g. vaseline? | No; that would be a barrier | Closed |
68 | Moisture Management | Draining wound | should be 'wound drainage management'? | yes | Closed |
69 | Moisture Management | Weeping Edema | A problem, not an interventions | Renamed | Closed |
70 | Moisture Management | barrier | should be "use of . . ." | OK | Closed |
71 | Moisture Management | MLUP | need more detail in term definition | remodeled | Closed |
72 | Moisture Management | Containment | under Urine Containment Device Type it lists colostomy. That should be urostomy. Colostomy would be under Fecal Containment. -NC | Moved | Closed |
73 | Moisture Management | Draining wound type | these look like devices, not wound types | true | Closed |
74 | Nutrition Management | Intake | Type is both enumerated and subclassed: redundant | removed classes | Closed |
75 | Nutrition Management | Intake, test, weight | These look like observations rather than interventions. Should they be goals? If so, should they include cc's or calories? | both | Closed |
76 | Nutrition Management | meal assistance | Unclear. Assistance to be provided? Are more details needed (kind of assistance)? | boolean | Closed |
77 | Nutrition Management | Supplements | Under Nutrition Management it is talking about supplements. It is unclear whether this is referring to a medical nutrition supplement such as Ensure or a supplement such as vitamin C, which is often given for wound healing. Under Nutrition Intake Type it lists supplement again but here I was sure we were talking about the Ensures and such until I looked at the enumeration box which contains both protein drinks and vitamins. I don't think protein drink is the right word for an Ensure and I think it is very confusing to mix both of these types of supplements under the same word. One is medical nutritional supplements ( choices can be high protein, high calorie, glucose control, meal replacement, etc.) and the other is vitamin and minerals (choices are multi vitamin, vit C, zinc, vit A, vit E, etc. )- NC | Remodeled generally as something consumed | Closed |
78 | Nutrition Management | Frequencey | Under Nutrition Intake Frequency - seems like it is missing the oral route - need to add regular meals or something for the people eating regularly. -NC | added | Closed |
79 | Skin Protection | equipment | Is the distinction between automated and manual significant? | Open | |
80 | Moisture Management | Holistic kind | Are these surface types appropriate for moisture management? | Open | |
81 | Nutrition Management | all | How do we draw a boundary between pressure ulcer management and this complex domain? | Open | |
82 | Medication use | all | How do we capture effect? Is potential effect necessary, if any actual effect will be captured elsewhere? | Open | |
83 | Medication use | all | need approach for classifying therapeutic effect (or all effects) | Open | |
84 | Medication use / condition | all | Surgery was mentioned as a risk factor, neither drug nor condition. Do we need to add it? | Open
|