PHER-CR03-ELR IG Correct SFT Example
See Change Requests for PHER Standards for instructions on using this form. Failure to adhere to these instructions may result in delays. Editing of formal proposals is restricted to the submitter and PHER co-chairs. Other changes will be undone. Comments can be captured in the associated discussion page.
(An announcement of this proposal must be submitted to the PHER list to be formally submitted.)
|Submitted by: Austin Kreisler on behalf of Hans Buitendijk||Revision date:|
|Submitted date: 3/22/2010||Change request ID: CR-03|
|Standard: ELR IG||Artifact ID, Name: ELR IG|
One of our folks was using at the guide and noticed in one of the examples using SFT that SFT inappropriately used a set id. Can you put it on the list of fixes for the next version or an errata? I don't think we have a proposal database for IGs yet and would not fit well as a V2.8 proposal. But if that's the place to manage it through, let me know and I'll submit.
It has the sample SFT as :
SFT|1|Level Seven Healthcare Software, Inc.^L^^^^&2.16.840.1.113822.214.171.124^ISO^XX^^^1234|1.2|An Lab System|56734||20080817
and really there are 6 fields not 7. It should look like:
SFT|Level Seven Healthcare Software, Inc.^L^^^^&2.16.840.1.1138126.96.36.199^ISO^XX^^^1234|1.2|An Lab System|56734||20080817
There isn't a set id.
- Correct Example in ELR IG
Recommended Action Items
Persuasive. Removed use of set ID in all SFT examples in ELR release 1 errata.