This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Negation Requirements Project Minutes 19 September 2018
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Back to Negation Minutes
Minutes
Meeting Information
HL7 PC-CIMI-POC Meeting Minutes Location: PC call line |
Date: 2018-09-19 Time: 4:00-5:00 PM ET | ||
Facilitator | Jay Lyle | Note taker(s) | Jay Lyle |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation
| |
y | Jay Lyle | JP Systems | |
y | Yanyan Hu | Joint Commission | |
y | Senthil Nachimuthu | 3M | |
y | Ken Lord | VA | |
y | Rob Hausam | IMO | |
Ben Hamlin | NCQA | ||
y | Lisa Nelson | ||
Emma Jones | Allscripts | ||
y | George Dixon | Allscripts | |
Michelle Miller | Cerner | ||
Michael Padula | Cerner | ||
Stephen Chu | |||
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- status matrix
Minutes
- Review of Excel version of status matrix
- Coordination with CDA
- Lisa is working with Jean Duteau
- Can we represent the CDA status matrix as well?
- Yes, but do this first.
- do we need to scope matrix to one version of FHIR?
- Do we need workflow perspective to understand how these resources are generated?
- That might be prohibitively expensive: 5 status * 6 status = 30 cases, but including transitions would mean ~30^2.
- Inactive hierarchy
- Does inactive mean not currently symptomatic but possibly of concern (viz., remission) or no longer present (viz., resolved)?
- Seems to be a confusion resulting from the fact that this property tries to support two requirements: "Is it symptomatic?" and "Are we concerned?"
- The answer may depend on folding in support for a concern requirement.
- Additional dimensions
- verification status - already broken out, though some argue it should not be
- presence - can we infer this from the status combinations? should we also record it explicitly?
- Coordination with CDA
Meeting Outcomes
Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items Agenda for 9/19:
|
© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.