March 03, 2015 CBCC Conference Call

Community-Based Collaborative Care Working Group Meeting

Back to CBCC Main Page

Attendees

	Member Name		x	Member Name		x	Member Name
x	Johnathan ColemanCBCC Co-Chair		x	Mike Davis Security Co-Chair		.	Steve Eichner
x	Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-Chair		x	John Moehrke		.	Rita Torkzadeh
x	Jim Kretz CBCC Co-Chair		.	Lori Simon		.	Paul Knapp
.	Max Walker CBCC Co-Chair		.	Mohammed Jafari		.	Harry Rhodes
x	Kathleen Connor		x	Ioana Singureanu		.	Tony Weida
	Diana Proud-Madruga		.	Steve Daviss		.	Wende Baker
x	Serafina Versaggi		.	Marlowe Greenberg		x	Chris Clark, WV
x	Rick Grow		.	Matt Peeling		.	Brian Newton
x	Lisa Nelson		x	Mike Lardiere		.	Amanda Nash
x	Ken Salyards		.	Oliver Lawless		.
x	Neelima Chennamaraja		x	Susan Litton		.	[mailto: Bill Kinsley]
.	[. Lloyd McKenzie]		.	[ .]		.	[.

Back to CBCC Main Page

Agenda DRAFT

1. (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Meeting Minutes from February 24 ]
2. (25 min) Security and Privacy Patient Friendly Natural Language for Consent Directives - Update

• Review of example consent flow diagram, updates to IG
• Name Change: tentative alternative proposed for NIB: Patient Friendly Language for Healthcare Privacy and Security User Interfaces (propose that CBCC members vote on new name next CBCC meeting)

3.(20 min) Data Provenance - TENTATIVE Review and vote on proposed ballot dispositions - Proposed DPROV CDA IG dispositions as of 12-15 Comment dispositions for voters asking for in person reconciliation will be prioritized if those voters attend the call.

• voter name: Lisa Nelson
  • confirm linkJan 20th version with Lisa's comments Need to discuss possible Informant Template
• voter name: Oliver Lawless
  • Oliver's comments Need to discuss proposed disposition updates, inclusion of Oliver's input in DSTU documentation and into any future Introductory Materials Document.
• voter name: Keith Boone

4. Discussion on CP 5525 To see all the open items for Security/CBCC http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemBrowse&tracker_id=677&tracker_query_id=4968 The specific item that is going to be most contentious is the CP 5525 where Lloyd asks us all to evaluate Contract to determine that each element in there is truly in the 80%. This is not to force us to remove items, but rather to force us to justify each item as being core to the resource. Note that a Profile can easily ADD elements it needs, just as easily as it can profile OUT items. Please review ALL of the ‘follow-up’ to get background.

5. (05 min) Action Item Review Should CBCC defer discusion on Lloyd's objections to FHIR Consent Directive profile (Note: this is not the one approved previously by CBCC), until the approved profile has been submitted to the continuous integration build.

6. (05 min) HL7 Implementation Guide for CDA Release 2: Privacy Consent Directives, Release 1 - Ballot Reconciliation Update

Meeting Minutes (DRAFT)

Meeting Minutes and Agenda

Meeting minutes from February 24 were unanimously approved.

Security and Privacy Patient Friendly Natural Language for Consent Directives - Update

• Rick and Kathleen are working to sync up the patient friendly and FHIR consent directive portions of this project.

Data Provenance Ballot Reconciliation

• The WG reviewed the proposed dispositions that Kathleen submitted toward Lisa Nelson's comments.
  • As a side note, Kathleen and Lisa had talked offline about addressing Lisa’s suggestion to have an Informant Participant template because there are use cases related to provenance that have explicit templates for other participants.
  • So, in today's meeting, Kathleen presented a draft template for Informant Participant for Lisa and other attendees to view.

Behavioral Health Domain Analysis Model (BH DAM)

• SAMHSA in conjunction with BH SMEs will continue to update the BH DAM in preparation for September ballot.

CP 5525 (see tracker link)

The specific item that is going to be most contentious is the CP 5525 where Lloyd asks us all to evaluate Contract to determine that each element in there is truly in the 80%. This is not to force us to remove items, but rather to force us to justify each item as being core to the resource. Note that a Profile can easily ADD elements it needs, just as easily as it can profile OUT items. Please review ALL of the ‘follow-up’ to get background.

Resolution and ACTION ITEM assigned by John:

Kathleen is going to bring back to the WG a current, actual implementation – potentially a pilot – that would help show the elements that we have in the consent directive.

Meeting adjourned at 1203 PST