This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
June 10, 2014 Security WG Conference Call
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Attendees
x | Member Name | x | Member Name | x | Member Name | x | Member Name | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | Mike DavisSecurity Co-chair | x | John MoehrkeSecurity Co-chair | . | Trish WilliamsSecurity Co-chair | . | Bernd BlobelSecurity Co-chair | ||||
. | Chris Clark | . | Johnathan ColemanCBCC Co-Chair | x | Kathleen Connor | . | Duane DeCouteau | ||||
. | Reed Gelzer | x | Suzanne Gonzales-WebbCBCC Co-chair | x | Rick Grow | x | David Henkel | ||||
. | Mohammed Jafari | . | Don Jorgenson | x | Alexander Mense | . | Amanda Nash | ||||
. | Paul PetronelliMobile Health Security Co-chair | . | Diana Proud-Madruga | . | Harry Rhodes | x | Aaron Seib | ||||
. | Ioana Singureanu | . | Walter Suarez | x | Tony Weida | x | Paul PetronellimHealth Co-chair | ||||
. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Agenda
- (05 min) Roll Call, Approval of Meeting Minutes
- (10 min) Trust Label Vocabulary Harmonization Proposal Review and Approval for Initial Submission - Kathleen
- (15 min) Proposed Methodology for Action/Operation Interoperability - Tony Weida
- (10 min) FHIR Issues gForge, Change Proposals assigned to Security - John
- (05min) Other business, action items, and adjournment
Meeting Minutes DRAFT
Minutes Summary
Meeting Minutes from 6/3 meeting were approved.
Trust Policy Vocabulary Harmonization Proposal
- Kathleen presented her Trust Policy Vocabulary diagram, showing how one could create a trust framework inside the vocabulary domain.
- John observed that the diagram’s content was not healthcare specific.
- Kathleen responded that the diagram is being organized to help healthcare entities communicate trust labels so they can discover trading partners with which they are comfortable.
- Kathleen made the motion to approve the initial submission of the Trust Policy Vocabulary harmonization proposal, and Aaron Seib seconded. There were no objections or abstentions, and so the proposal will move forward.
- Note: after submission, we have three weeks to think about whether it’s possible to have levels of assurance that map to local levels so the data is interoperable.
Proposed Methodology for Action/Operation Interoperability
- Tony Weida gave a presentation on the proposed methodology for Action/Operation Interoperability.
- Kathleen objected to the proposal, explaining that the scope of the Way with Verbs project was to harmonize the vocabulary in the ontology. She recommended that a revision be made to the scope of the project.
FHIR issues - Security's role in responding to Change Proposals
- John suggested that, for the Change Proposals assigned to Security, this group actively discuss the proposals. The discussion should
address if we understand the proposal and agree with the submitted comments.
Action Items
None