This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
January 31st, 2012 CBCC Conference Call
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Contents
- 1 Community-Based Collaborative Care Working Group Meeting
- 1.1 Meeting Information
- 1.2 Attendees
- 1.2.1 Issue #1: We need access to UB-04 code sets to determine whether there are appropriate values that can be used in various BH value sets, e.g., “referral codes”.
- 1.2.2 Issue #1: Gender identity is politically sensitive and we need more input from other stakeholders.
- 1.2.3 Issue #3: Sexual orientation is politically sensitive and we need more input from other stakeholders.
- 1.3 Action Items
Community-Based Collaborative Care Working Group Meeting
Meeting Information
Attendees
- Jim Kretz
- Richard Thoreson CBCC Co-chair
- Ioana Singureanu
- Serafina Versaggi
- Daniel Crough
- Madan Gopal
- Kathleen Connor
Serafina Versaggi described the approach used to specify standard-based value sets for coded attributes included in the BH Domain Analysis Model (subject of the May 2012 draft-for-comment ballot).
- Clinical documentation in the electronic record is the primary source for codes used in billing. Since billing relies on ICD codes, if electronic record systems capture clinical data using SNOMED-CT natively, a transformation from SNOMED-CT to ICD must be performed. (ICD-9-CM until Oct. 2013 when ICD-10 will be the standard)
- Cross walks between SNOMED-CT and ICD (9 & 10) already exist, as do cross walks between DSM-IV TR and ICD-9-CM, ICD-10
- For some attributes (e.g., problems) our team has not constrained the coding system(s) to the suggested value set (e.g. DSM-IV, SNOMED-CT, etc) but instead simply recommends a valid coding system, or a node in the SNOMED-CT concept hierarchy (sub-hierarchy).
- Problems/diagnoses and procedures with be the subject of revisions of the DAM for the May 2012 ballot (future work)
- We will describe the analysis and mapping at a higher level by adding a slide after slide #3 (Terminology mapping overview)
- It was pointed out that seriously mentally ill patients – acute care and BH care patients - are treated by the same source through two channels. These are currently merged resulting in an increased need for interoperability between specialty and primary care.
Issue #1: We need access to UB-04 code sets to determine whether there are appropriate values that can be used in various BH value sets, e.g., “referral codes”.
Issue #1: Gender identity is politically sensitive and we need more input from other stakeholders.
Issue #3: Sexual orientation is politically sensitive and we need more input from other stakeholders.
Action Items
- We need to summarize the vocabulary mapping and any outstanding gaps (SV)
- We need to revise the balloting road map for the work group
Meeting Adjourned at 1517 EDT