This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Harmonization Process Change
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Contents
- 1 Status of This Page
- 2 Background and Objectives
- 3 Approval Process
- 4 "Membership" - Representation, Voting, Quorum
- 5 Harmonization vis-a-vis Balloting
- 6 Harmonization Decision Registry
- 7 Supporting Wiki Pages
- 8 Prior Page Content and History
Status of This Page
This page is being drafted to hold a set of updates to the existing Vocabulary and RIM Harmonization Process page, based on experiences and concerns that were raised in October 20153.
This is NOT complete document. It carries the TOC of the primary document to allow comments and proposed changes to be classified by the section to which they apply.
Background and Objectives
Approval Process
Submission Process and Schedule
Initial Proposal Deadline
Initial Proposal Rules
Required Data Elements
Content-Endorsing Sponsor
International Override
Technical Review
Final Proposal Deadline
Followup Review
Appeals
Harmonization Meeting
Amendment During Meeting
Proponent Presence Required During Item Discussion
Ratification of Universal Value Set Bindings by HL7 International Council
Adoption and Publication
"Membership" - Representation, Voting, Quorum
Representation of Work Groups and Stewards
Designation of Representatives
Quorum Requirements
Voting - Simple- and Super-Majority
Harmonization vis-a-vis Balloting
Ballot "Scope" for RIM and Vocabulary elements
Harmonization Decision Registry
Supporting Wiki Pages
Prior Page Content and History
This Page was initiated by Russ Hamm May 17, 2010
I moved two prior Harmonization-related sub-items (that had been listed under MnM on the "Main page") here, because as this page is completed, this is where those links belong. GWBeeler
- Harmonization Wiki Template
- This template came into being in 2006, but has never been formally used as a harmonization source path. I (GWBeeler) suggest this be dropped for the following reason(s):
- The current proposal management process is highly dependent upon being able to extract specific data fields from the Word document, and the Wiki template has no facilities that lend themselves to reliable automated parsing.
- We should focus current improvements on the updating of the Word "template"
- This template came into being in 2006, but has never been formally used as a harmonization source path. I (GWBeeler) suggest this be dropped for the following reason(s):
- Vocabulary Harmonization Tool
- The Vocabulary Maintenance Language remains a main-stay of vocabulary harmonization processing, but the specific tool linked from here has no active users, and therefore, I (GWBeeler) suggest this link be dropped.