February 5, 2013 CBCC Conference Call

Community-Based Collaborative Care Working Group Meeting

Back to CBCC Main Page

Attendees

• Daniel Crough

• Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-chair

• Adrianne James
• Jim Kretz

• Richard Thoreson CBCC Co-chair
• Ken Salyards
• Ioana Singureanu
• Serafina Versaggi
• Kate Wetherby

Agenda and Minutes

1. (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Jan 29 Minutes & Accept Agenda
2. (05 min) Review Action Items from last week
3. (20 min) Review SME Engagement and Terminology Analysis materials - spreadsheet
4. (10 min) FEI Briefing (Ioana)
5. (15 min) WGM follow-up (Suzanne & Richard) - deferred from last meeting
   • Three-year Plan:
   • Meeting Minutes - Suzanne to complete & Serafina to review. Minutes to be approved on next Tuesday's CBCC Call (2/5/13) Suzanne to post
   • Work Group Mission and Charter - review with attendees, send to listserve and have approved by DESD before posting
6. (05 min) Wrap Up, Review Action Items and Propose Agenda Items for Next Week

Roll Call, Approve Jan 29 Minutes & Accept Agenda Role Call taken, January 29, 2013 meeting minutes approved (0 opposed, 0 abstain, remaining approved)

Meeting Notes

• Feedback received from Peter Humphries will be added to the Consent Directive IG
• Concern regarding what types of HL7 artifacts were free IP; regardless, CBCC will proceed with balloting in terms of ballot levels. There is no concern for the upcoming 3 three ballots

• Upcoming ballots for May 2013: (add links)
  • Behavior Health DAM (Informative)
  • Behavior Health IG (DSTU)
  • Consent Directive (Normative)

Per Richard, there is a plan to capture a statement for BH summary to assure backward compatibility of templates.

ACTION ITEM: Richard was to write a paragraph to the Behavioral Health package. we are trying to expand on areas that are critical to interoperatbilty to healthcare practictioners and other…

Dates for outreach orientation: (from Serafina) Final walk is scheduled for February 20 at

Response to: What you have now is not anywhere near what a typicaly psychiatrist does in a normal day of work

Does anyone know/approach from the guilds who have specific knowledge of the areas/ancillary services to tap as many experts within SAMHSA?

• If someone were to write up a brief with the desired use cases (updating the current use caess from the DAM
• We did not flesh out the child health use cases
• Want to focus attention on the kinds of services which coul be coordinated for our youth; if the idea of coordination of care—for 7 different domains, where safety net folks getting speciality saftely net procedurs wo use these materials,

see SAMHSA Value sets Review (Meaningful Use Data Standards for Young People (paper) 1. Housing/Homeless (e.g. housing status) 2. School (e.g. grade point) 3. Family social services (e.g. type of services) 4. Income assistance (e.g. income/subsidy level) 5. Foster care (e.g. total # in guardian’s care) 6. Food (e.g. purchased food value) 7. Criminal justice (e.g. legal status)

Using experts ask: First level: What information would be most helpful for sharing information between the x (where x is one of the seven categories above) and community based practioners…?

The BH SOW work handing was to state the value sets and map them.

to SAMHSA trying to develop standards that will be reusable across service silgold standard.os. the services are potentially irrelevant, the information should be shared for coordination of care as well as public health report and to build a longitutidal record.