Feb 7th, Templates Minutes

1. Roll Call
   1. Ian Townend (IT)
   2. Grahame Grieve (GG)
   3. Mark Shafarman (MS)
   4. Craig Parker (CP)
   5. Russ Hamm (RH)
2. Agenda Check

1. Template ballot resolution
   1. GG - Thought more was done on the spreadshhet.
   2. IT - My comments are not on the speadsheet.
   3. GG - section 4.5 (Incompleteness) Has this been sufficiently exapnded?
      1. MS - Yes
      2. RH - Yes
   4. GG - Section 1.4 was to have a big knife taken to it. This has not been done yet.
   5. GG - Does SPL allow and support Templates?
      1. Yes
   6. GG - 5.7 External Meaning - in the last paragraph: "A consequence of these rules is that templates can only be used for the backbone classes."
   7. GG - Lloyd claims that "backbone classes" is not a term that is defined for use.
   8. IT - It exists in "foundation->RIM Section 1.3.1" as a descriptive term used to define the composition of the RIM
   9. RH - Why does section 5.10 exist?
   10. GG - Will wrap into section 4.5 and remove 5.10
   11. GG - What sections are informative appendicies? Was proposed to move Conformance Section 3 to be informative appendix?
   12. RH - Any objections to keeping section 3.0 as normative.
   13. RH - We announce that 3.0 will remain normative (see action item)
   14. GG - Section 4.9 Constraint Requirements
       1. Comment was that this should be informative,
       2. The author will modify the section to note that they should be the same as Static model requirements, but since these are not formally defined we specify that SMR should work towards.

1. Next Agenda Topics.
2. Action Items
   1. Check on intent to ballot document (Mark to check with Don Lloys, Russ to check with Woody)
   2. Ask Galen to get minutes on hl7 site
   3. Announce that Section 3.0 will remain normative (Grahame, Russ to Skype Grahame)
3. Adjourn

http://informatics.mayo.edu/wiki/index.php/Feb_7th%2C_Templates_Agenda