FHIR Consent December 9, 2015

Attendees

	Member Name	x	Member Name	x	Member Name
x	Johnathan ColemanCBCC Co-Chair	x	Kathleen Connor	x	Tarik Idris
	William Kinsley	x	Russell McDonell	x	John Moehrke Security Co-Chair
	Marty Prahl		Diana Proud-Madruga	x	Pat Pyette
x	Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-Chair	x	David Staggs	x	Glen Marshal
x	Rob Horn		Beth Pumo		[1]

Comments on first draft of Privacy Consent Directive IG
- FHIR Consent IG - December 4, 2015
Discussion on how to use Contract.subject for ConsentDirective
- Holds the reference to the Patient
  - Discussion has observed it might be multiple Patient resources to support groups of patients
- Holds the reference to all the data subject to the Consent

Ready to Vote

6861 2015May sdc #78 - What is subject? (James Kretz) Considered - Question Answered
7691 2015May core #982 - Is "subject" supposed to identify the data covered by the consent? (Ioana Singureanu)
6864 2015May sdc #81 - Only one mandatory element in consent directive (James Kretz) Considered - Question Answered
7531 2015May core #822 - ConsentDirective ballot status (Grahame Grieve) Persuasive with Mod

Key decision - to request that FM WG update FHIR Contract with the following changes that this group considers essential for FHIR Consent Directive profile on Contract:
- Add Contract.subject defined as "the entity impacted by or of interest to the contract", which supports easy query for a Patient's Consent Directive, even if the same information is included in the ConsentDirective.actor.
- Change the name of Contract.actor to Contract.party
- Change the name of current Contract.subject to Contract.topic, and keep current definition.
Kathleen to proposed this at the next FM call.

Proposal was moved by Kathleen, seconded by John, and approved 7-0-0.