This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
FHIR Consent Apr 7, 2017
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Contents
HL7 CBCC FHIR Consent Working Meeting
Weekly Meeting Logistics
Weekly meeting; Fridays 2:00 - 3:00 PM Eastern Time
Dial-in Number: (515) 604-9861
International Dial-in Numbers are provided
Access Code: 429554
Online Meeting Link: http://join.freeconferencecall.com/cbhs
Back to FHIR Consent Directive Project Main Page
Attendees
| Member Name | x | Member Name | x | Member Name | x | Member Name | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X | David Pyke CBCC co-Chair | . | Johnathan Coleman CBCC Co-Chair | . | Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-Chair | . | Grahame Grieve FHIR Director | ||||
| . | Alexander Mense Security Co-Chair | . | Kathleen Connor Security Co-Chair | . | John MoehrkeSecurity Co-Chair | . | Jim Kretz CBCC Co-Chair | ||||
| . | Glen Marshall | . | Tarik Idris | . | Ken Salyards | . | Diana Proud-Madruga | ||||
| . | Mike Davis | . | Neelima Chennamaraja | . | Ken Sinn | X | Beth Pumo | ||||
| X | Joe Lamy, Aegis | . | Joseph Quinn | X | Iona Thraen | X | Serafina Versaggi | ||||
| . | Igor Sirkovich | . | M'Lynda Owens | . | Mohammad Jafari | . | Linda Michaelson | ||||
| X | Lisa Nelson | . | Hank MayersPCWG Representative | . | Laura Heermann Langford PCWG Co-chair | X | Steve Eichner |
Back to FHIR Consent Directive Project Main Page
Agenda
- Roll-call
- Review past two meetings notes for consensus
- Additional scope consent work status.
- Advance Care Directives: Consent to instructions for potentially needed medical treatment (e.g. DNR).
- Consent for Treatment: Consent to undergo a specific treatment (or record of refusal to consent).
Minutes
- Roll Call
- Conversation revolved over concern over the type of resource this is. We're moving a security based resource into a care provision resource. It's role will be confusing to developers who will be unsure what role this resource has.. Possibly two or three divorced resources will ultimately be necessary
- We also need to Need to differentiate use for DocumentReference/Composition and Consent. Should the consent resource point to the document or the document
- Will the Composition resource that contains the document/form information point to the Consent resource for treatment/research or will the Consent resource point to the Composition resource as a source?
- For example consent.pdf has both consent and insurance information and could be a DocumentReference or Composition depending on how the information was brought into the system. If a Composition, then some believe that the Composition would be the primary resource and it would point to the Consent resource for the consent information and an FM resource for the insurance information. The Consent resource would have the information about the consent section for machine use.
- However, it would also be possible that the Consent resource would be the primary and would point to the Composition resource as the source authorization document.
- In order to move forward we feel that this would be needed to be resolved to better give an understanding of the role of the Consent resource. This information will be brought to FHIR-I and FMG for insight
