Example-Consent-OptIn-NotThis

This is an example showing the use-case 2 from Canadian Real World Consent Directive Scenarios by Pat Pyette

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<Contract xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://hl7.org/fhir ../../schema/coverage.xsd">
  <id value="C-123"/>

  <text>
    <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The following scenario is based on existing jurisdictional policy and are realized in existing systems in Canada. 
	The default policy is one of implied consent for the provision of care, so these scenarios all deal with withdrawal or withholding consent for that purpose. 
	In other jurisdictions, where an express consent model is used (Opt-In), these would examples would contain the phrase "consent to" rather 
	than "withhold" or "withdraw" consent for.
    <p>
	specific to use-case 2. Withhold or withdraw consent for disclosure of a specific record (e.g. Lab Order/Result) 
	</p><p>
    Patient "P. van de Heuvel" Primary Care Provider, Dr. Philip Primary, has ordered a set of lab test which Adam 
   wishes to keep as private as possible.  At the sample collection facility, he indicates that he would 
   like withhold consent to disclose the order and all results associated with that specific order from 
   all other providers  
   </p>
   </div>
  </text>

  <issued value="2015-11-18"/>
 <!-- not bound by a timeframe -- Contract.applies -->
 
  <subject>
    <reference value="Patient/f001"/>
    <display value="P. van de Heuvel"/>
  </subject>

  <!-- I assume the example given is Canada Infoway wide???  AND I assume it is desired to state that in the Contract.authority element -->
  <authority>
      <reference value="Organization/Infoway"/>
	  <display value="Canada Infoway"/>
   </authority>
	  
   <!-- and/or would this [also] go into Contract.domain as a Jurisdiction?? (see the example on UK Pharamacy Juristiction) -->
  <domain>
      <reference value="Organization/Infoway"/>
	  <display value="Canada Infoway"/>
   </domain>
   
  <type>
     <coding>
	   <system value="http://hl7.org/fhir/contracttypecodes"/>
	   <code value="privacy"/>
	 </coding>
  </type>

  <!-- made up code-system to represent the set of privacy consent sub-types known and published by Canada Infoway -->
  <subtype>
     <coding>
	   <system value="http://www.infoway-inforoute.ca.org/Consent-subtype-codes"/>
	   <code value="Opt-In"/>
	   <display value="Default Authorization with exceptions."/>
	 </coding>
  </subtype>
 
   <term>
     <type>
       <coding>
	     <!-- made up code system -->
	     <system value="http://hl7.org/fhir/consent-term-type-codes"/>
	     <code value="withhold-identified-object-and-related"/>
		 <display value="Withhold the identified object and any other resources that are related to this object."/>
	   </coding>
	 </type>
	 <subject>
       <reference value="Order/f201"/>
	 </subject>
     <!-- by not specifying term.actor I assume this means everyone? -->
	 <text value="Withhold this order and any results or related objects from any provider."/>
   </term>
   <!-- the terms of the consent in friendly consumer speak -->
   <friendly>
     <contentAttachment>
	   <title value="The terms of the consent in friendly consumer speak."/>
	   <!-- likely use url pointer to common text -->
	 </contentAttachment>
   </friendly>
   <!-- the legal terms of the consent in lawyer speak -->
   <legal>
     <contentAttachment>
	   <title value="The terms of the consent in lawyer speak."/>
	   <!-- likely use url pointer to common text -->
	   <!-- I think some think that this should be the pointer to the law by which this consent is derived under. Such as http://lois-laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/P-21/index.html -->
	 </contentAttachment>
   </legal>
</Contract>