This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
EA Alpha PASS
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Contents
Alpha Project - PASS
- PASS - Privacy, Access and Security Services Functional Model, by SOA WG
- Led by Don Jorgenson, ArB liaison Abdul-Malik Shakir
- Project Insight # 200 Summary
- PASS Alpha Project draft charter
- Project Wiki site at http://hssp-security.wikispaces.com/
Baseline Artifact Assessment - Architecture Framework
Spec. | Topic / Viewpoint | Candidate Alpha Project’s Current or Planned Artifacts | Current State (Existence, Completeness, Known Issues, etc.) | Planned Approach |
Blueprint | Enterprise / Business Viewpoint | Domain Business Context
|
In process. | Build on subproject work from the last 2 years. |
Information viewpoint | Domain Analysis Model Domain Information Model |
In process. | Developed concurrently. | |
Computational viewpoint | Collaboration Analysis | In process. | Aligned with related subproject specs to ensure proper tie-in. | |
Engineering viewpoint | . | . | . | |
Platform –Independent | Enterprise / Business Viewpoint | . | . | . |
Information viewpoint |
|
. | Build on conceptual models. | |
Computational viewpoint | Service Behavioral Model | . | Build on conceptual models. | |
Engineering viewpoint | . | . | . | |
Platform-Specific | Enterprise / Business Viewpoint | . | . | . |
Information viewpoint | Message Schema Binding | . | Build on conceptual and PIM models. Target alignment with key existing implementations | |
Computational viewpoint | Collaboration scripts | . | Build on conceptual and PIM models. Target alignment with key existing implementations | |
Engineering viewpoint | . | . | . |
Baseline Artifact Assessment - Audit, Access Control, Identity and Consent
Spec. | Topic / Viewpoint | Candidate Alpha Project’s Current or Planned Artifacts | Current State (Existence, Completeness, Known Issues, etc.) | Planned Approach |
Blueprint | Enterprise / Business Viewpoint | Domain Analysis Model | In process. | Core working team creates all documentation and is:
|
Information viewpoint | Domain Information Model | In process. | Developed concurrently with Domain Analysis Models. | |
Computational viewpoint |
Functional Model |
Access, Audit and Consent in process. | Builds on Domain Analysis and Domain Information Models | |
Engineering viewpoint | . | . | . | |
Platform –Independent | Enterprise / Business Viewpoint | . | . | . |
Information viewpoint |
|
. | Build on conceptual models. | |
Computational viewpoint |
Service Behavioral Model |
. | Build on conceptual models. | |
Engineering viewpoint | . | . | . | |
Platform-Specific | Enterprise / Business Viewpoint | . | . | PSM level documents can be created independently but will use above review process for documentation. |
Information viewpoint | Context Token XML Schema | . | Build on conceptual and PIM models. Target alignment with key existing implementations | |
Computational viewpoint |
Platform Binding - Web services |
. | Build on conceptual and PIM models. Target alignment with key existing implementations | |
Engineering viewpoint | . | . | . |
Baseline Artifact Assessment - Privacy Consent Directive DAM
Spec. | Topic / Viewpoint | Candidate Alpha Project’s Current or Planned Artifacts | Current State (Existence, Completeness, Known Issues, etc.) | Planned Approach |
Blueprint | Enterprise / Business Viewpoint |
Business Use Case Analysis (DAM, Sections 1.1, 1.2) |
Balloted as informative in Jan.2009 | . |
Information viewpoint |
Information and Terminology Analysis in DAM Chapters 2, 3, 4, 5 |
Balloted as informative in Jan.2009 | . | |
Computational viewpoint |
Interactions/collaborations analysis in DAM Section 1.3 |
Balloted as informative in Jan.2009 | . | |
Engineering viewpoint | . | . | . | |
Platform –Independent | Enterprise / Business Viewpoint |
CPC D Section 1 |
Balloted as draft for comment May 2009 | To be balloted as DSTU in Sept. 2009 |
Information viewpoint |
CPC D Section 2 |
Balloted as draft for comment May 2009 | To be balloted as DSTU in Sept. 2009 | |
Computational viewpoint |
CPC D Section 3 |
Balloted as draft for comment May 2009 | To be balloted as DSTU in Sept. 2009 | |
Engineering viewpoint | Mapping algorithm to XACML, ODRL | In progress | To be published with the ballot | |
Platform-Specific | Enterprise / Business Viewpoint | . | . | . |
Information viewpoint | XSD | Available | To be published with the ballot | |
Computational viewpoint | WSDL | Available | To be published with the ballot | |
Engineering viewpoint | Pilot implementation for mapping to XACML, ODRL | Planned | This type of tooling will be done if implementers are interested in it. |
Status of PASS balloting
2009-12-11: PASS Access Control will ballot; Architecture Framework not proceeding to ballot Jan2010. Access Control scped across three of the four RM-ODP viewpoints, business, informational and computational. Planning to go DSTU.
Access Control
- HL7 Version 3 Standard: Privacy, Access and Security Services (PASS) - Access Control, PIM Level, Release 1 [HL7 PASS AC PIM R1 ]
- HL7 Version 3 Standard: Privacy, Access and Security Services (PASS) - Access Control, PIM Level, Release 1 - DSTU May 2010 postponed
- HL7 Version 3 Standard: Privacy, Access and Security Services - Access Control, Release 1 - DSTU 2010Jan
Audit
- HL7 Version 3 Standard: Privacy, Access and Security Services (PASS) - Audit, Conceptual Level, Release 1 [HL7 PASS AUDIT CL R1 ] - DSTU May 2010 postponed
- HL7 Version 3 Standard: Privacy, Access and Security Services (PASS) - Audit Services, Release 1 - DSTU September 2010
Architecture Framework
- HL7 Version 3 Standard: Privacy, Access and Security Services (PASS) Architecture Framework, Release 1 [HL7 PASS AF R1 ] - Informative 2010Jan postponed
Functional Model
- HL7 Version 3 Standard: Privacy, Access and Security Services (PASS) Functional Model, Release 1 [HL7 PASS FM R1 2007] - no status