April 22, 2015 Security WG Conference Call

Meeting Information

Back to Security Main Page

Attendees

Member Name	Present		Member Name	Present		Member Name	Present
Mike Davis Security Co-chair	x		John Moehrke Security Co-chair	x		Trish Williams Security Co-chair
Bernd Blobel, Security Co-chair	.		Johnathan Coleman	x		Kathleen Connor	x
Duane DeCouteau	.		Reed Gelzer	.		Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-chair	x
Rick Grow	x		David Henkel	x		Mohammed Jafari	.
Don Jorgenson	.		Diana Proud-Madruga	x		Harry Rhodes	.
Ioana Singureanu	.		.	.		Ross Freeman	.
Amanda Nash			Walter Suarez	.		Tony Weida	x
Chris Clark	.		Paul Petronelli	.		Aaron Seib, 2311, LLC	x
	.			.			.

Back to Security Main Page

Agenda

1. (05 min) Roll Call, Approve [1]
2. (15 min) HL7 Security WGM AGENDA
3. (15 min) topic “What is FHIR Provenance integrity control?
4. (10 min) Scope Statement - Natural Language
5. (10 min) Scope Statement - Data Provenance

Meeting Minutes

Meetings Minutes from 4/15: Objections: none; Abstentions: none; Minutes approved

Meetings Minutes from 4/08: Objections: none; Abstentions: none; Minutes approved

WGM Agenda

Project Scope Statement: Patient Natural Language

• Discussed in CBCC, some information to be added
• Draft ready for Security to look at

Project Scope Statement: Data Provenance

• under development and ready some time next week,
• primarily driven by CBCC but supported by Security and other working groups.

• Johnathan leaving early Thursday AM, add Wed time to do a joint CBCC-Security discussion on the Data Provenance Project

Within the Provenance there is an integrity from 0...1

• you can only have one signature, the intent is so that it is a single digital signature that it is pointing at... it is intended to be an integrity signature. Its a minimalistic functionality to support early in FHIR. Explicitly in the security section, it speaks to the digital signature--they are more complex than are carried within the provenance signature.
• why would this resource have an integrity signature if it is also meant to be for another...?? Why is this not on every resource?

<<add to data provenance discussion>>

Meeting adjourned at 1458 PST --Suzannegw (talk) 21:58, 22 April 2014 (UTC)