This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
20170328 US Realm SC Call
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
back to US_Realm_Steering_Committee
back to US_Realm_Steering_Committee_Conference_Calls
| US Realm Steering Committee Call Agenda/Minutes |
Date: 2017-03-28 Time: 1 PM Eastern | ||
| Co-Chairs | Ed/Brett | Note taker(s) | Anne |
| Attendee / Name | |||||
| x | Calvin Beebe | Keith Boone | x | Hans Buitendijk | |
| x | Lorraine Constable | Regrets | Johnathan Coleman | Regrets | Ed Hammond |
| x | Tony Julian | x | Paul Knapp | x | Austin Kreisler |
| x | Brett Marquard | Ken McCaslin | x | Nancy Orvis | |
| Brian Pech | x | Wayne Kubick | Mark Roche | ||
| Regrets | Sandra Stuart | . | Pat Van Dyke | x | Anne Wizauer |
| Danielle Friend | . | Eric Haas | . | Jenni Syed | |
| Steve Posnak | . | David Susanto | . | Craig Parker | |
| x | Christol Green | . | . | ||
| Visitor/ Name | |||||
| x | Ioana Singureanu | Floyd Eisenberg | |||
| no quorum definition | |||||
Agenda
Administrivia
- Agenda review
- Review notes from 20170321_US_Realm_SC_Call
- Action Items
- Ed and others to being work on a set of rules regarding the responsibility of US Realm Steering Committee
- Create DMP
- Review Items
- Project Approval of Cross-Paradigm Implementation Guidance for Medical Device Data Sharing with Enterprise Health Systems
- Discussion:
- Question from TSC:
- Should publication requests for US Realm projects be sent to US Realm Steering Committee for approval before being approved by TSC?
- Question from TSC:
- Review of any outstanding issues
Minutes
- Agenda review
- Agenda accepted
- Review notes from 20170321_US_Realm_SC_Call
- MOTION to approve: Hans/Paul
- VOTE: all in favor
- Action Items
- Ed and others to being work on a set of rules regarding the responsibility of US Realm Steering Committee
- Create DMP
- Brett asks about best practices. Austin notes there is a template to use to start with that is normally intended for WGs. Could start with SGB or FGB.
- Discussion over quorum. Decision to make quorum Chair + 7.
- MOTION to set quorum at Chair + 7: Paul/Calvin
- VOTE: All in favor
- Review Items
- Project Approval of Cross-Paradigm Implementation Guidance for Medical Device Data Sharing with Enterprise Health Systems
- Ioana describes project. Removed cosponsors because they did not respond. All docs are at http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/dcmmd/frs/. Now will ballot in September as opposed to May - Ioana will shift the target dates. Floyd: Was CQI a cosponsor? Ioana: CQI was not asked but they would be welcome. Ioana will send copy to all cochairs with request to cosponsor and join call on Friday.
- MOTION to approve: Hans/Lorraine
- VOTE: All in favor
- Ioana describes project. Removed cosponsors because they did not respond. All docs are at http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/dcmmd/frs/. Now will ballot in September as opposed to May - Ioana will shift the target dates. Floyd: Was CQI a cosponsor? Ioana: CQI was not asked but they would be welcome. Ioana will send copy to all cochairs with request to cosponsor and join call on Friday.
- Project Approval of Cross-Paradigm Implementation Guidance for Medical Device Data Sharing with Enterprise Health Systems
- Discussion:
- Question from TSC:
- Should publication requests for US Realm projects be sent to US Realm Steering Committee for approval before being approved by TSC?
- Austin is in favor of it to close the loop. Paul: The realm of an artifact can change so US Realm should be an approval step for definitive US Realm artifacts. Calvin: Would we ever have cause to reject the request? Lorraine: There should at least be a notification step. Austin: Perhaps something could be done in parallel to sending it to TSC e-vote. Paul: From a TSC perspective, ballot publication approvals are light from an administrative perspective. Floyd: I hear that publication takes a long time - will this delay publication further? Paul: The major part of that time is ANSI approval. Floyd: This is for STUs, CDA type documents or updates to a V3. Austin: V3s don't go out until the next normative edition. CDAs go out as pdfs and usually turn around in days. Brett asks to clarify Floyd's question though - would this add more time? Wayne: Can one or two people on TSC approve for US Realm at the same time as TSC approval to scout out any issues? We clearly have overlap. Austin would welcome formalizing and designating that.
- MOTION that the US Realm would prefer to designate a member sitting on both TSC and US Realm to take on this role of approving documents for publication from a US Realm perspective: Calvin/Paul
- VOTE: All in favor
- Austin is in favor of it to close the loop. Paul: The realm of an artifact can change so US Realm should be an approval step for definitive US Realm artifacts. Calvin: Would we ever have cause to reject the request? Lorraine: There should at least be a notification step. Austin: Perhaps something could be done in parallel to sending it to TSC e-vote. Paul: From a TSC perspective, ballot publication approvals are light from an administrative perspective. Floyd: I hear that publication takes a long time - will this delay publication further? Paul: The major part of that time is ANSI approval. Floyd: This is for STUs, CDA type documents or updates to a V3. Austin: V3s don't go out until the next normative edition. CDAs go out as pdfs and usually turn around in days. Brett asks to clarify Floyd's question though - would this add more time? Wayne: Can one or two people on TSC approve for US Realm at the same time as TSC approval to scout out any issues? We clearly have overlap. Austin would welcome formalizing and designating that.
- Should publication requests for US Realm projects be sent to US Realm Steering Committee for approval before being approved by TSC?
- Question from TSC:
- Adjourned
Meeting Outcomes
| Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
© 2017 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved
