This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
20160621 US Realm SC Call
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
back to US_Realm_Steering_Committee
back to US_Realm_Steering_Committee_Conference_Calls
| US Realm Steering Committee Call Agenda/Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 156896# |
Date: 2016-06-21 Time: 1 PM Eastern | ||
| Co-Chairs | Ed/Brett | Note taker(s) | Anne |
| Attendee / Name | |||||||||||
| x | Calvin Beebe | Keith Boone | x | Hans Buitendijk | |||||||
| x | Lorraine Constable | x | Johnathan Coleman | Regrets | Ed Hammond | ||||||
| x | Tony Julian | x | Paul Knapp | x | Austin Kreisler | ||||||
| x | Brett Marquard | x | Ken McCaslin | Nancy Orvis | |||||||
| x | Brian Pech | x | Wayne Kubick | Mark Roche | |||||||
| Sandra Stuart | . | Pat Van Dyke | x | Anne Wizauer | |||||||
| x | Danielle Friend | . | Eric Haas | . | Jenni Syed | ||||||
| x | Steve Posnak | . | David Susanto | . | Visitor / Name | ||||||
| Ioana Singureanu | |||||||||||
| no quorum definition | |||||||||||
Agenda
Administrivia
- Agenda review
- Review notes from 20160607_US_Realm_SC_Call
- Action Items
- All to review US Realm Input document and email Ed with suggestions and comments
- Review Items
Discussion:
- Review of any outstanding issues
Minutes
- Minutes approved; Austin/Hans. All in favor
- Action Items
- All to review US Realm Input document and email Ed with suggestions and comments
- Discussion topics
- Role of US Realm Steering Committee
- Brett displays slides put together from a combination of Grahame's document and committee member responses. Management tasks: Maintain relationships btw USRSC and other relevant existing groups; proactively work towards harmonization of various US projects; define and maintain US Realm IGs. Do people feel these are appropriate? Lorraine: Defining and maintaining IGs is not a management task. Rewording: Provide coordination and content consistency across US guides; identify overlapping scope; extension of TSC/ARB/MnM publication processes that exist. Eric/Brett: If USRSC is not the steward of the US Realm artifacts, who should be? Austin: Our role should be to make recommendations to the board. Steve Posnak: would like to see US Realm be the convening body for US realm stakeholders - support for US Realm profile registry. May need to recommend changes to the current mission and charter to accommodate new directions. Austin: we need to determine if the steering committee becomes a management group, or if we have a US Realm governance, management, and methodology group. You could view the US Realm as a very specific product line. Hans: it would be good to recognize those aspects but not sure if it's necessary at this time to kick up three different groups. Discussion over LOI and LRI. Wayne: we could create a coordinated list of all of the US realm IGs that are out there as a start. Paul: we already have a list that could be scoped down. Wayne: All should make a list of groups that USRSC may liaison with; discussion over whether that is included in mission and charter. Hans points out that we need to make sure that we balance across all stakeholders and not just FHIR.
- ACTION: Anne to research if there's a list of all of the US IGs
- ACTION: Brett to send document to Anne for posting in minutes.
- ACTION: All review and provide input to role of USRSC
- Role of US Realm Steering Committee
- Review Items
- Behavioral Health Data Exchange Cross-Paradigm Implementation Guide
- Ioana Signureanu here to present project. Hans asks about reference to LOI guides. What is the relationship with those guides? Is this mean to be complementary guidance meant to clarify, or is it also meant to further constrain and add additional data that those guides may not have included? Ioana: We are looking at incremental guidance. We are not attempting to constrain but point implementers in the right direction. Hans asks to add OO as a cosponsor to help out with documentation of whether behavioral health is an extension/profile to LOI. Also check off V2 messages - clinical. Paul: Asks to have "cross-paradigm" moved to the beginning of the title. Ioana updates. Title now reads "Cross-Paradigm Behavioral Health Data Exchange Implementation Guidance." Austin: previous releases of this were DSTUs and this is switching to Informative? Ioana: That is correct. Eric Haas: Does FMG need to cosponsor? Hans: It would probably be FHIR-I. Ioana: Does it need FMG approval? Yes. FHIR-I should be co-sponsor and FMG should also review the project. Further suggestions/edits.
- MOTION by Hans to approve; second by Johnathan
- VOTE: All in favor
- Behavioral Health Data Exchange Cross-Paradigm Implementation Guide
Meeting Outcomes
| Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
© 2016 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved
