This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
2016-05-20 PC CIMI POC Call Minutes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Back to PC CIMI POC Minutes
Minutes Template
Meeting Information
HL7 PC-CIMI-POC Meeting Minutes Location: HL7 WGM, Montreal |
Date: 2016-05-20 Time: 9:00-10:30 ET | ||
Facilitator | Jay Lyle | Note taker(s) | Jay Lyle |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation
| |
Richard Esmond | PenRad | ||
Galen Mulrooney | JP Systems | ||
y | Jay Lyle | JP Systems / VA | |
Stan Huff | Intermountain | ||
y | Susan Matney | Intermountain | |
Susan Campbell | |||
Michael Sterly | |||
Gerard Frieks | |||
Serafina Versaggi | |||
y | M'Lynda Owens | ||
Larry McKnight | |||
Agenda
Agenda Topics
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
- Check listserv: notice may not have gone out
- PSS: TSC & ARB questions
- 1) New product definition is checked - is this truly a new product?
- 1. We didn’t know what to check. If it doesn’t qualify as a product, maybe there’s a better choice.
- 2) Timeline: Most dates have passed on the timeline listed in the PSS. Is this the correct timeline?
- 2. It is dragging on a bit. I’ll run some new dates by the team on Tuesday.
- 3) The investigative project box is not checked, although the scope states it is investigative. Wondering if it was meant to be an investigative project in terms of the PSS.
- 3. I suppose it’s investigative. But the checkbox suggested that allowed “limited scope definition,”
- 1) New product definition is checked - is this truly a new product?
and it wasn’t investigative enough to require that. Though perhaps question 1 means it is anyway.
- 4) ARB may be interested in the project.
- 4. OK, meaning as participants, or to review?
- 4) ARB may be interested in the project.
- CEM update
- Susan has given skin inspection & braden to modeling team at Intermountain to create CEMs
- Question: 'normal for race and ethnicity' is not a color.
- Answer: neither is 'cyanotic'; they're all judgments.
- Braden: need to get aggregate score into LOINC. Temporary value for this node.
- Susan has given skin inspection & braden to modeling team at Intermountain to create CEMs
- We looked at some models and sent this question to the list:
- I asked last week whether a LOINC code or an observable should be bound to the root node of a model or to a "code" attribute. I think the answer was that the whole model refers to more than the observable, and that the IMHC approach was to use the model identifier as a sort of semantic identifer for that. And that the thing measured or observed in the "value" field should be identified in a "code" field. But the examples I'm seeing in the CIMI browser are binding LOINC codes to the root. (E.G., http://www.clinicalelement.com/cimi-browser/#/20150809/CIMI/CIMI-CORE-ITEM_GROUP.troponin_i_serplmcnc.v1.0.0)
- Composition
- CQI project: observation, statement, complete/observed
- Impact on Inheritance Map
- Terminology values
- Schedule for CEM, text, PenRad approaches
Meeting Outcomes
Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.