This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
20150624 arb minutes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ARB - Meeting (Date in Title)
Agenda
- Call to order
- Roll Call
- Approval of Agenda and Minutes
- Methodology
- Publishing Risks Task from TSC (40 minutes)
- Arb should not be solving the problem, but rather putting together a strategy.
- What does the architecture look like to get there?
- Include HL7 Risks for publishing practices.
- current publishing risks
- RDF Mapping
- Publishing Risks Task from TSC (40 minutes)
- Other business and planning
- Adjournment
Meeting Information
HL7 ArB Work Group Meeting Minutes Location: Telcon |
Date: 20150424 Time: 4:00pm U.S. Eastern | |||||
Facilitator | Julian, Tony | Note taker(s) | Julian, Tony | |||
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | ||||
X | Bond,Andy | NEHTA | ||||
X | Constable, Lorraine | Constable Consulting Inc. | ||||
. | Dagnall, Bo | HP Enterprise Services | ||||
. | Hufnagel, Steve | ????? | ||||
X | Julian, Tony | Mayo Clinic | ||||
X | Knapp, Paul | Pknapp Consulting | ||||
. | Loyd, Patrick | ICode Solutions | ||||
. | Lynch, Cecil | Accenture | ||||
R | Milosevic, Zoran | Deontik Pty Ltd | ||||
. | Quinn, John | Health Level Seven, Inc. | ||||
X | Stechishin,Andy | CANA Software and Service Ltd. | ||||
. | Guests | |||||
X | Mead, Charlie | Vidal Group, Paris,France | ||||
X | Hyland, Mario | Aegis | ||||
. | Laakso, Lynn | HL7 | ||||
. | ||||||
. | Legend | |||||
X | Present | |||||
. | Absent | |||||
R | Regrets | |||||
Quorum Requirements (Co-chair + 3) Met: Yes |
Minutes
- Agenda was approved by consensus
- Minutes approval (16June2015 minutes)
- Motion to approve(Andy S, Paul)
- Vote(5-0-0)
- Methodology
- Publishing Risks Task from TSC
- The slide deck was reviewed. Key points seem to be:
- Publishing Risks Task from TSC
- Risks: Unable to progress w/o key persons.
- Gather what is out there
- Principles and guidance
- Look at a vision of the future.
- end-state goals of sustainability, usability,
- Look at project basis instead of enterprise basis.
- Based on projects proponents tooling.
- Requirements have not been spelled out. These requirements are not known by all of those involved.
- We have a set of Requirements but not rules for application.
- Failure of enterprise to govern the organization.
- Other challenge is that a piece of the services are contracted and managed (Staff), deal with aspects of running the organization, but key functions are outside of that.
- We have allowed gaps in the resource fabric to become barriers to fulfilling the intentions of the organization.
- Need recommendations on governance to prevent inconsistency in the future.
- Either accept as is, or mature our behaviors.
- Outcome1: For next week pull together a list of projects in flight.(Lorraine and Andy S.)
- Next week put together an outline.
- Specify requirements for publications.(Andy S. & Paul)
- Obligations/Market requirements.
- Assess level of risk.
- We have work-groups that have tooling strategy, and no funding.
- organization has funding, but no strategy.
- RDF Mapping PSS
- Comment heard:FHIR core group now thinks that rim-mapping is a good thing, but no bandwidth to do so.
- Charlie: Not their project - not just about FHIR: If the results are optimal, it would spread across FHIR, to all of our artifacts.
- Lorraine: Assertion is that the tooling should be buried in the build tools.
- Charlie: Ok, but the project is to develop.
- Paul: We should for HL7 develop the architecture: there will be multiple tool sets to apply to the architecture. Market wants to know how to map/migrate from one standard to another.
- Charlie: Initial project should be ARB.
- Adjournment at 4:10 pm U.S. Eastern