This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "Data Types R2 issues"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 20: Line 20:
  
 
{|+ border="1"
 
{|+ border="1"
−
|-
+
|- style="background:grey"
 
| '''ID''' || '''Topic''' || '''Type''' || '''Category''' || '''Status''' || '''Ranking''' || '''Volunteer''' || '''Priority'''
 
| '''ID''' || '''Topic''' || '''Type''' || '''Category''' || '''Status''' || '''Ranking''' || '''Volunteer''' || '''Priority'''
−
|-
+
|- style="background:yellow"
 
|  1 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 1|Add CD.group]] || CD || Abstract || approved || Significant
 
|  1 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 1|Add CD.group]] || CD || Abstract || approved || Significant
 
|-
 
|-
Line 30: Line 30:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|  4 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 4|Add GTS.code]] || GTS || Abstract || Proposed || Very Significant || LM || LM
 
|  4 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 4|Add GTS.code]] || GTS || Abstract || Proposed || Very Significant || LM || LM
−
|-
+
|- style="background:yellow"
 
|  5 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 5|Add HIST.controlActIdRef]] || HIST || Abstract || Approved|| Trivial || LM || LM
 
|  5 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 5|Add HIST.controlActIdRef]] || HIST || Abstract || Approved|| Trivial || LM || LM
 
|-
 
|-
 
|  6 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 6|Add PIVL.frequency]] || PIVL || Abstract || Approved || Significant || LM || LM
 
|  6 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 6|Add PIVL.frequency]] || PIVL || Abstract || Approved || Significant || LM || LM
−
|-
+
|- style="background:red"
 
|  7 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 7|Add PLIST as LIST ancestor]] || LIST || Abstract || Rejected|| Signficant || LM || LM
 
|  7 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 7|Add PLIST as LIST ancestor]] || LIST || Abstract || Rejected|| Signficant || LM || LM
 
|-
 
|-
Line 40: Line 40:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|  9 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 9|Clarify BAG-SET-LIST relationship]] || COLL || Abstract || Proposed || Significant || LM || LM
 
|  9 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 9|Clarify BAG-SET-LIST relationship]] || COLL || Abstract || Proposed || Significant || LM || LM
−
|-
+
|- style="background:yellow"
 
| 10 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 10|Create URG constraint on UVP]] || UVP || Abstract || Approved || Very Significant || LM || LM
 
| 10 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 10|Create URG constraint on UVP]] || UVP || Abstract || Approved || Very Significant || LM || LM
−
|-
+
|- style="background:yellow"
 
| 11 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 11|Derive ADXP and ENXP from SC]] || AD / EN || Abstract || Approved || Trivial || LM || LM
 
| 11 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 11|Derive ADXP and ENXP from SC]] || AD / EN || Abstract || Approved || Trivial || LM || LM
 
|-
 
|-
Line 62: Line 62:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 20 || #[[Datatypes R2 Issue 20|Cardinality of IVL<T>]] || IVL || Abstract || ? || Trivial || LM || LM
 
| 20 || #[[Datatypes R2 Issue 20|Cardinality of IVL<T>]] || IVL || Abstract || ? || Trivial || LM || LM
−
|-
+
|- style="background:yellow"
 
| 21 || #[[Datatypes R2 Issue 21|New mime types for CDA]] || ED || Abstract || Approved || Trivial
 
| 21 || #[[Datatypes R2 Issue 21|New mime types for CDA]] || ED || Abstract || Approved || Trivial
 
|-
 
|-
Line 84: Line 84:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 31 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 31|Null constraints]] || all || Abstract || Approved || Significant || LM || LM
 
| 31 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 31|Null constraints]] || all || Abstract || Approved || Significant || LM || LM
−
|-
+
|- style="background:yellow"
 
| 32 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 32|cd.code rules]] || CD || Abstract || Approved || Normal
 
| 32 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 32|cd.code rules]] || CD || Abstract || Approved || Normal
 
|-
 
|-
Line 90: Line 90:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 34 || #[[Datatypes R2 Issue 34|Removed Properties]] || all || XML || ? || Normal
 
| 34 || #[[Datatypes R2 Issue 34|Removed Properties]] || all || XML || ? || Normal
−
|-
+
|- style="background:yellow"
 
| 35 || #[[Datatypes R2 Issue 35|UID Case sensitivity]] || II || Abstract || Approved || Trivial || LM || LM
 
| 35 || #[[Datatypes R2 Issue 35|UID Case sensitivity]] || II || Abstract || Approved || Trivial || LM || LM
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 36 || #[[Datatypes R2 Issue 36|URI issue]] || URL || Abstract || Closed || Trivial
 
| 36 || #[[Datatypes R2 Issue 36|URI issue]] || URL || Abstract || Closed || Trivial
−
|-
+
|- style="background:yellow"
 
| 37 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 37|Fax issue]] || URL || Abstract || Approved || Trivial || LM || LM
 
| 37 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 37|Fax issue]] || URL || Abstract || Approved || Trivial || LM || LM
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 38 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 38|Type Substitution]] || all || Abstract ||  ? || Normal || LM || LM
 
| 38 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 38|Type Substitution]] || all || Abstract ||  ? || Normal || LM || LM
−
|-
+
|- style="background:yellow"
 
| 39 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 39|DEL null content issue]] || ADXP || Abstract || Approved || Editorial || LM || LM
 
| 39 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 39|DEL null content issue]] || ADXP || Abstract || Approved || Editorial || LM || LM
−
|-
+
|- style="background:red"
 
| 40 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 40|ProbabilityDistributionType]] || vocab || Abstract || Abandoned || Nothing
 
| 40 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 40|ProbabilityDistributionType]] || vocab || Abstract || Abandoned || Nothing
−
|-
+
|- style="background:red"
 
| 41 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 41|decimal significance]] || REAL || Abstract || Abandoned || Nothing
 
| 41 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 41|decimal significance]] || REAL || Abstract || Abandoned || Nothing
 
|-
 
|-
Line 116: Line 116:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 47 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 47|xml attributes]] || all || XML || Proposal || Normal
 
| 47 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 47|xml attributes]] || all || XML || Proposal || Normal
−
|-
+
|- style="background:yellow"
 
| 48 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 48|CS element form]] || CS || XML|| Approved || Trivial
 
| 48 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 48|CS element form]] || CS || XML|| Approved || Trivial
 
|-
 
|-
Line 158: Line 158:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 68 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 68|Text Telephone Number]] || TEL || Abstract|| Proposed || Normal || LM || LM
 
| 68 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 68|Text Telephone Number]] || TEL || Abstract|| Proposed || Normal || LM || LM
−
|-
+
|- style="background:yellow"
 
| 69 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 69|CD.translation changes]] || CD || Abstract || Approved || Catastrophe
 
| 69 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 69|CD.translation changes]] || CD || Abstract || Approved || Catastrophe
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 70 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 70|PQR Visibility]] || PQR || Abstract || Proposed || Trivial
 
| 70 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 70|PQR Visibility]] || PQR || Abstract || Proposed || Trivial
−
|-
+
|- style="background:red"
 
| 71 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 71|LanguageCommunication DataType]] || -- || Abstract || Rejected || Nothing
 
| 71 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 71|LanguageCommunication DataType]] || -- || Abstract || Rejected || Nothing
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 72 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 72|DATAVALUE.specialisationType]] || -- || Abstract || Proposed || Significant || LM || LM
 
| 72 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 72|DATAVALUE.specialisationType]] || -- || Abstract || Proposed || Significant || LM || LM
−
|-
+
|- style="background:yellow"
 
| 73 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 73|CD.valueSet]] || CD || Abstract || Approved|| Normal
 
| 73 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 73|CD.valueSet]] || CD || Abstract || Approved|| Normal
 
|-
 
|-
Line 178: Line 178:
 
|-  
 
|-  
 
| 78 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 78|PQR coding rationale]] || PQR || Abstract || Partially Approved || Significant || GS || GS
 
| 78 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 78|PQR coding rationale]] || PQR || Abstract || Partially Approved || Significant || GS || GS
−
|-  
+
|- style="background:yellow"
 
| 79 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 79|CD coding rationale]] || CD || Abstract || Approved || Significant || GG || GG
 
| 79 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 79|CD coding rationale]] || CD || Abstract || Approved || Significant || GG || GG
−
|-  
+
|- style="background:yellow"
 
| 80 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 80|CE Translations & Conformance]] || CD & CE || Abstract || Approved || Significant || GG || GG
 
| 80 || [[Datatypes R2 Issue 80|CE Translations & Conformance]] || CD & CE || Abstract || Approved || Significant || GG || GG
 
|-}
 
|-}

Revision as of 10:48, 3 May 2007

This is the register of known data types issues for release 2. (R2 XML ITS datatypes has been merged into this list for XML ITS data type issues.)

R2 Datatypes Taskforce

Status list:

  •  ? : to be clarified
  • clarification: still gathering information
  • discussion: clarification is complete. discussion is progressing
  • proposal: has been resolved out of committee, waiting for formal resolution in committee
  • approved: INM has approved the proposed resolution, waiting for the editor to apply to the document
  • complete: editing is complete
  • abandoned: proposal has been abandoned

Volunteer column:

  • initials indicate willing to participate int resolving the issue

Priority column:

  • initials indicate person desires issue to be included in the next release of the Abstract Data Types
  • Legend for initials (please add yours): LM - Lloyd McKenzie;

'# = No description supplied

ID Topic Type Category Status Ranking Volunteer Priority
1 Add CD.group CD Abstract approved Significant
2 Add DRVQ mixin for Quantity QTY Abstract Proposed Very Significant LM LM
3 Add ED.translation ED Abstract Proposed Significant LM LM
4 Add GTS.code GTS Abstract Proposed Very Significant LM LM
5 Add HIST.controlActIdRef HIST Abstract Approved Trivial LM LM
6 Add PIVL.frequency PIVL Abstract Approved Significant LM LM
7 Add PLIST as LIST ancestor LIST Abstract Rejected Signficant LM LM
8 Add STT datatype ST Abstract Proposed Significant LM LM
9 Clarify BAG-SET-LIST relationship COLL Abstract Proposed Significant LM LM
10 Create URG constraint on UVP UVP Abstract Approved Very Significant LM LM
11 Derive ADXP and ENXP from SC AD / EN Abstract Approved Trivial LM LM
12 Drop identity-equality distinction ANY Abstract Proposed Very Significant LM LM
13 Generalize originalText ANY Abstract Proposed Significant LM LM
14 Relax Unit Constraint on PQ PQ Abstract Proposed Normal
15 XML Representation of Collection Type and NullFlavor COLL XML Proposed Normal LM LM
16 #XML Representation of SLIST SLIST XML ? Normal
17 #Add title or filename to ED ED Abstract ? Trivial
18 #GTS.translation GTS Abstract ? ?
19 #Add Bounded PIVL (BPVL) PIVL Abstract ? ?
20 #Cardinality of IVL<T> IVL Abstract ? Trivial LM LM
21 #New mime types for CDA ED Abstract Approved Trivial
22 New CD definitions CD Abstract ? Trivial LM LM
23 Rename Snomed RT Vocab Abstract Proposal Editorial
24 vocab domain issues Vocab Abstract Discussion Trivial
25 II.reference II Abstract Closed Normal
26 #Special CDA Type ED Abstract ? Trivial
27 EIVL<TS> Issues EIVL Abstract ? Significant
28 #GTS literal GTS XML ? Significant
29 PPD<T> issues PPD Abstract ? Significant
30 Add Bag.literal BAG Abstract Proposal Trivial
31 Null constraints all Abstract Approved Significant LM LM
32 cd.code rules CD Abstract Approved Normal
33 #language binding in XML ED XML ? Significant
34 #Removed Properties all XML ? Normal
35 #UID Case sensitivity II Abstract Approved Trivial LM LM
36 #URI issue URL Abstract Closed Trivial
37 Fax issue URL Abstract Approved Trivial LM LM
38 Type Substitution all Abstract ? Normal LM LM
39 DEL null content issue ADXP Abstract Approved Editorial LM LM
40 ProbabilityDistributionType vocab Abstract Abandoned Nothing
41 decimal significance REAL Abstract Abandoned Nothing
42 #RTO xsi:type RTO XML ? Normal
43 #order of HIST and HXIT narrative Abstract ? Editorial
44 #PIVL issues PIVL Abstract ? Signficant
45 #comp name SET Abstract ? Trivial
46 #PPD QTY.diff issues PPD Abstract ? Significant
47 xml attributes all XML Proposal Normal
48 CS element form CS XML Approved Trivial
49 #PQR originalText PQR Abstract ? Normal
50 #CD.original text demotion CD Abstract ? Editorial
51 Support for Likert scales CO Abstract Discussion Normal
52 #Missing demotions all Abstract ? Trivial
53 #IVL attribute names IVL Abstract ? Significant
54 CE definition error CE Abstract Proposal Editorial LM LM
55 Update mode & Audit Trail all Abstract Clarification Normal LM LM
56 SRCH semantics EN Abstract ? Significant LM LM
57 II.useCode II Abstract Discussion Significant LM LM
58 #GTS Frequency Code GTS Abstract ? Signficant LM LM
59 Unknown home phone number TEL Abstract Approved Significant LM LM
60 #Data Type Flavors all Abstract ? Normal LM LM
61 PHON semantics EN Abstract ? Significant
62 Add AD.use PHON+SRCH AD Abstract ? Significant LM LM
63 IVL narrative issue IVL Abstract Proposal Editorial
64 IVL center issue IVL Abstract ? Significant
65 IVL center/width and low/high issue IVL Abstract ? Editorial
66 conformance to preferred OID root II,C* Abstract ? Significant
67 Clarification of Promotion and Demotion All Abstract ? Normal LM LM
68 Text Telephone Number TEL Abstract Proposed Normal LM LM
69 CD.translation changes CD Abstract Approved Catastrophe
70 PQR Visibility PQR Abstract Proposed Trivial
71 LanguageCommunication DataType -- Abstract Rejected Nothing
72 DATAVALUE.specialisationType -- Abstract Proposed Significant LM LM
73 CD.valueSet CD Abstract Approved Normal
74 Unencoded NullFlavor ANY Abstract Proposed Trivial LM LM
75 II Root Usage warning II Abstract Proposed Trivial
76 II.reference URI not just URL II ITS Proposed Trivial
77 II.assigningAuthorityName use not clear II Abstract Proposed Trivial LM LM
78 PQR coding rationale PQR Abstract Partially Approved Significant GS GS
79 CD coding rationale CD Abstract Approved Significant GG GG
80 CE Translations & Conformance CD & CE Abstract Approved Significant GG GG
Retrieved from "https://wiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=Data_Types_R2_issues&oldid=12524"