2016-05-20 PC CIMI POC Call Minutes

Back to PC CIMI POC Minutes

Minutes Template

Meeting Information

HL7 PC-CIMI-POC Meeting Minutes Location: HL7 WGM, Montreal		Date: 2016-05-20 Time: 9:00-10:30 ET
Facilitator	Jay Lyle	Note taker(s)	Jay Lyle
Attendee	Name	Affiliation
	Richard Esmond	PenRad
	Galen Mulrooney	JP Systems
y	Jay Lyle	JP Systems / VA
	Stan Huff	Intermountain
y	Susan Matney	Intermountain
	Susan Campbell
	Michael Sterly
	Gerard Frieks
	Serafina Versaggi
y	M'Lynda Owens
	Larry McKnight

Agenda

Agenda Topics

Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:

• Check listserv: notice may not have gone out
• PSS: TSC & ARB questions
  • 1) New product definition is checked - is this truly a new product?
    • 1. We didn’t know what to check. If it doesn’t qualify as a product, maybe there’s a better choice.
  • 2) Timeline: Most dates have passed on the timeline listed in the PSS. Is this the correct timeline?
    • 2. It is dragging on a bit. I’ll run some new dates by the team on Tuesday.
  • 3) The investigative project box is not checked, although the scope states it is investigative. Wondering if it was meant to be an investigative project in terms of the PSS.
    • 3. I suppose it’s investigative. But the checkbox suggested that allowed “limited scope definition,”

and it wasn’t investigative enough to require that. Though perhaps question 1 means it is anyway.

• • 4) ARB may be interested in the project.
    • 4. OK, meaning as participants, or to review?
• CEM update
  • Susan has given skin inspection & braden to modeling team at Intermountain to create CEMs
    • Question: 'normal for race and ethnicity' is not a color.
    • Answer: neither is 'cyanotic'; they're all judgments.
  • Braden: need to get aggregate score into LOINC. Temporary value for this node.
• We looked at some models and sent this question to the list:
  • I asked last week whether a LOINC code or an observable should be bound to the root node of a model or to a "code" attribute. I think the answer was that the whole model refers to more than the observable, and that the IMHC approach was to use the model identifier as a sort of semantic identifer for that. And that the thing measured or observed in the "value" field should be identified in a "code" field. But the examples I'm seeing in the CIMI browser are binding LOINC codes to the root. (E.G., http://www.clinicalelement.com/cimi-browser/#/20150809/CIMI/CIMI-CORE-ITEM_GROUP.troponin_i_serplmcnc.v1.0.0)
• Composition
  • CQI project: observation, statement, complete/observed
  • Impact on Inheritance Map
• Terminology values
• Schedule for CEM, text, PenRad approaches

Meeting Outcomes

Actions begin construction of test classes

Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items Review test class progress & tooling

© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.