Difference between revisions of "V3 Publishing ConCall Minutes 20091118"
Astechishin (talk | contribs) (→Don) |
Astechishin (talk | contribs) (→Don) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
not done | not done | ||
===Don=== | ===Don=== | ||
| − | email ballot cleanup | + | Don was sending email to the various WG co-chairs to describe the ballot cleanup actions being taken. |
| − | Austin | + | Austin: may need to push to TSC (with large enough comment from the WG) |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | Annotated ECG can be pulled from the ballot site | |
| − | |||
| − | Austin: | + | Don: Leaving the links in the LHS (left hand side menu) means it is not as clear as possible, especially if the goal is to clean up left hand content. |
| + | Another way to handle this would be a listing. Use the V3 ballot site for ballot versus a V3 reference | ||
| + | |||
| + | Austin: Does the product catalogue help fulfill this overall reference? | ||
Don: Lynn is preparing the product catalogue, the goal is primarily marketing | Don: Lynn is preparing the product catalogue, the goal is primarily marketing | ||
| − | Jean: | + | Jean: Could a reference site with NE plus ballot plus DSTU be created? |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | Don: Yes, there is a temp site already, with a link from Project Insight | |
| − | |||
| − | + | Woody: LHS clean-up was not the prime objective of the ballot site cleanup. Question where does LHS come from? | |
| + | Can its use be managed? | ||
| − | + | Don: There would be more programming needed. The LHS menu is managed via PubDB, but it needs a manual update. | |
| − | + | Woody: We should not let people forget what is in the NE | |
| − | + | Jean: The ballot site should just be what is being balloted | |
| − | + | Austin: Yes, we must retain links to NE | |
| − | + | Woody: Let us start with removal (by creating a reference link to the NE content) of non-balloting content | |
===Adjourned at 4:21=== | ===Adjourned at 4:21=== | ||
== == | == == | ||
Latest revision as of 05:04, 2 December 2009
Contents
Wednesday, November 18, 2009 -- 4:00 PM Eastern
Present
Beeler, Duteau, Kreisler,Lloyd, Stechishin, Savage
Agenda
Call to order at 4:05
Review Minutes of November 11, 2009
not done
Don
Don was sending email to the various WG co-chairs to describe the ballot cleanup actions being taken.
Austin: may need to push to TSC (with large enough comment from the WG)
Annotated ECG can be pulled from the ballot site
Don: Leaving the links in the LHS (left hand side menu) means it is not as clear as possible, especially if the goal is to clean up left hand content. Another way to handle this would be a listing. Use the V3 ballot site for ballot versus a V3 reference
Austin: Does the product catalogue help fulfill this overall reference?
Don: Lynn is preparing the product catalogue, the goal is primarily marketing
Jean: Could a reference site with NE plus ballot plus DSTU be created?
Don: Yes, there is a temp site already, with a link from Project Insight
Woody: LHS clean-up was not the prime objective of the ballot site cleanup. Question where does LHS come from? Can its use be managed?
Don: There would be more programming needed. The LHS menu is managed via PubDB, but it needs a manual update.
Woody: We should not let people forget what is in the NE
Jean: The ballot site should just be what is being balloted
Austin: Yes, we must retain links to NE
Woody: Let us start with removal (by creating a reference link to the NE content) of non-balloting content
