This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "V3 Publishing ConCall Minutes 20090729"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
*Gello R2 added  
 
*Gello R2 added  
 
*Restructured XML ITS material
 
*Restructured XML ITS material
request feedback from people to changes in structure
+
*Request feedback from people to changes in structure
 
===Gregg Seppala===
 
===Gregg Seppala===
 
*Has some CMETs for ballot without a change to the introduction
 
*Has some CMETs for ballot without a change to the introduction
**1 remaining pa normative cmet will not finish till after meeting
+
**1 remaining PA normative CMET will not finish until after WGM
**3 scheduling cmets for comment only
+
**3 scheduling CMETs are for comment only
 
+
**Dale - preface pages have often been updated just prior to opening of the ballot
Dale - preface page updated just before ballot
+
*In desktop generator are any QA reports available?
 
 
*In desktop generator are any QA reports available
 
 
**Woody offered that there are reports but they may not be useful as yet, there is an outstanding goal to improve QA reports
 
**Woody offered that there are reports but they may not be useful as yet, there is an outstanding goal to improve QA reports
 +
**Issues may still exist even if PubDB is updated
  
woody - may still have issues even if pub db is updated
+
===CMET Ballot Status===
 
+
*Don - new CMETs ballot status is difficult to determine, some work groups update the status, Don tries to check with others
don - new cmets ballot status is best kept secret, some update, don tries to check
+
**As an example, the Common Product Model CMET ballot announcement does not specify the CMET by number
comm prod mdl cmet ballot annouce does not spec cmet by number
+
*Don suggested that the NIB should specify CMET at least by name
 
+
*Woody suggested that for the interim, the pre-existing CMET status spreadsheet could be mailed around
don - suggestion for NIB please specify CMET at least by name
+
**Publishing Facilitator could update the status of CMETs
 +
**Updated spreadsheet could then generate the ballot information and/or CMETinfo file
 +
*Dale suggested he could translate the CMET master spreadsheet into a wiki page
  
woody - common place mail around xls then generate bllot or cmetinfo
+
There was a general discussion of how to manage the CMET status on the wiki, including using categories to group CMETs by domain and status.
dale would translate cmet master xls into wiki
 
  
discussion of how to manage on wiki
+
'''Action:''' Dale to look at CMET spreadsheet list and how to manage the ballot status of CMETs going forward, Andy offered help
  
Dale Action to look at CMERT list and how to manage Andy offered help
+
===Pete Gilbert===
 
+
*Wondered if the RMIM for eMeasures submitted Tuesday was acceptable  
===Pete===
 
*Wondered if the RMIM submitted Tuesday was acceptable  
 
 
**Don ran a  build - failed with: Serializable model with 2-way associations
 
**Don ran a  build - failed with: Serializable model with 2-way associations
 
**Austin commented that on act-relationship there is an indicator
 
**Austin commented that on act-relationship there is an indicator
Line 54: Line 52:
 
**Don recommended using a link similar to one used for examples
 
**Don recommended using a link similar to one used for examples
 
**Woody recommended following section 6 in CDA for specifying links to schemas
 
**Woody recommended following section 6 in CDA for specifying links to schemas
 +
 
===Adjourned at 4:56===
 
===Adjourned at 4:56===
 
== ==
 
== ==

Latest revision as of 19:17, 5 August 2009

Return to Publishing Committee
Minutes of Recent Publishing Conference Calls

Wednesday, July 29, 2009 -- 4:00 PM Eastern

Present

Beeler, Gilbert, Kreisler, Lloyd, Nelson, Seppala, Stechishin, Savage

Agenda

Call to order at 4:03

Review Minutes of July 22, 2009

Rob/Austin 6-0-0

Reconcilliation Ballot Content

Deadline is July 27 - only applies to normative content

Notes from Don Lloyd

  • Is missing some content
    • Has been in contact with those work groups and content is coming
    • Common product model CMET heard from Mead Walker will be working on
  • 1 new domain: eMeasures
  • Has also added info button material to be posted standalone
  • Gello R2 added
  • Restructured XML ITS material
  • Request feedback from people to changes in structure

Gregg Seppala

  • Has some CMETs for ballot without a change to the introduction
    • 1 remaining PA normative CMET will not finish until after WGM
    • 3 scheduling CMETs are for comment only
    • Dale - preface pages have often been updated just prior to opening of the ballot
  • In desktop generator are any QA reports available?
    • Woody offered that there are reports but they may not be useful as yet, there is an outstanding goal to improve QA reports
    • Issues may still exist even if PubDB is updated

CMET Ballot Status

  • Don - new CMETs ballot status is difficult to determine, some work groups update the status, Don tries to check with others
    • As an example, the Common Product Model CMET ballot announcement does not specify the CMET by number
  • Don suggested that the NIB should specify CMET at least by name
  • Woody suggested that for the interim, the pre-existing CMET status spreadsheet could be mailed around
    • Publishing Facilitator could update the status of CMETs
    • Updated spreadsheet could then generate the ballot information and/or CMETinfo file
  • Dale suggested he could translate the CMET master spreadsheet into a wiki page

There was a general discussion of how to manage the CMET status on the wiki, including using categories to group CMETs by domain and status.

Action: Dale to look at CMET spreadsheet list and how to manage the ballot status of CMETs going forward, Andy offered help

Pete Gilbert

  • Wondered if the RMIM for eMeasures submitted Tuesday was acceptable
    • Don ran a build - failed with: Serializable model with 2-way associations
    • Austin commented that on act-relationship there is an indicator
    • Woody stated the Visio validator may help identify problems, as well "Save to repository" will identify many issues
  • Bob Dolin is generating eMeasure schema, Pete wondered what the link will be so he can add to the document
    • Don recommended using a link similar to one used for examples
    • Woody recommended following section 6 in CDA for specifying links to schemas

Adjourned at 4:56