This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Rules for Using And & Or in Queries"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Smrobertson (talk | contribs) |
Smrobertson (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
===Description=== | ===Description=== | ||
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | ||
| + | |||
2016-05-09 Montreal Mon Q1 discussion: old topic, no recent interest/question on the topic. Agreed to close. (Tom may update description with previous discussion) | 2016-05-09 Montreal Mon Q1 discussion: old topic, no recent interest/question on the topic. Agreed to close. (Tom may update description with previous discussion) | ||
| + | |||
===Discussion=== | ===Discussion=== | ||
2012 May WGM Mon Q2 - John H recalls that Tom/Hugh were taking this to MnM. Unclear on any followup or resolution. | 2012 May WGM Mon Q2 - John H recalls that Tom/Hugh were taking this to MnM. Unclear on any followup or resolution. | ||
Latest revision as of 18:57, 9 May 2016
|
Related Links |
Rules for Using And & Or in Queries
Description
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
2016-05-09 Montreal Mon Q1 discussion: old topic, no recent interest/question on the topic. Agreed to close. (Tom may update description with previous discussion)
Discussion
2012 May WGM Mon Q2 - John H recalls that Tom/Hugh were taking this to MnM. Unclear on any followup or resolution.
2012-09-10 Tom: MnM ruled the interpretation was up to the individual committee. Tom will draft suitable words.
