Difference between revisions of "Relevant and Pertinent"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 15: Line 15:
 
*[[RnP Wednesday, September 9]]
 
*[[RnP Wednesday, September 9]]
  
= Presentation Review =
+
= Engagement Materials =
The initial presentation to explain the project is here [[File:RnP.pptx]]
+
The presentation to explain the project is here [[File:RnP.pptx]]
 +
 
 +
A PDF of the long survey can be found here [[File:LongSurvey.pdf]]
 +
 
 +
The long survey can be taken here []
 +
 
 +
A PDF of the short survey can be found here [[File:ShortSurvey.pdf]]
 +
 
 +
The short survey can be taken here []
  
 
=Questions to Address=
 
=Questions to Address=

Revision as of 21:44, 11 September 2015

Meetings

Engagement Materials

The presentation to explain the project is here File:RnP.pptx

A PDF of the long survey can be found here File:LongSurvey.pdf

The long survey can be taken here []

A PDF of the short survey can be found here File:ShortSurvey.pdf

The short survey can be taken here []

Questions to Address

Insert your page listing questions to ask here! Then add your questions to that page. That way, people can provide different approaches without necessarily being influenced by what others have already done.

Keith's RnP Questions
George's RnP Questions
David's RnP Questions
Emma's RnP Questions

Questionnaires/Surveys

June 10th -- initial review of questions

First Draft of Questionnaire

August 5th -- 5-10 minute provider survey

Draft of short provider survey to be sent to large audience, created by Robert Dieterle, Dr. Russ Leftwich, Dr. Holly Miller
Short Provider Survey

August 26th - Long Survey

Long Provider Survey

September 9th - Short Survey (updated by Bob)

Updated Short Survey of Providers

Reference Materials

Beacon Community EHR Affinity Domain

Initial Communication Draft

Dear [NAME]

As part of the HL7 drive to enhance global health data interoperability, the Structured Documents workgroup, in partnership with Clinical Interoperability Council and Patient Care workgroups, have launched a project to help reduce the information overload that can result from excessive detail in CCD/C-CDA document implementations as needed for meaningful use requirements.

This project’s was initiated by HL7 in response to feedback from providers about their experiences with the Transitions of Care objective as required in the CMS Meaningful Use incentive program. Many providers said that the Summary of Care Records (SOCR) that they have been receiving are not as useful as they would like. Among the issues raised were: too much information, SOCRs are too long, takes too long to find what is relevant and pertinent. To accomplish this, we are conducting a study with practitioners and professional association members to identify what they believe is the more relevant and pertinent set of information that they would need for a health care encounter. This gathered information will help the project create potential rules for what should be included in a response for healthcare information.

We would like your assistance in this endeavor. We would like to meet virtually to describe the purpose of the project and explain how to complete the survey. If you are then interested we would like you fill out a short questionnaire regarding what you feel are the most relevant and pertinent details you need in your encounters, this would help us help the healthcare industry. We would then like to follow up in another virtual meeting refine and clarify the feedback we've collected.

Please let us know if you will be able to help us help.


Sincerely,

[SOMEBODY OF AUTHORITY]