This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here

Difference between revisions of "Reference - Informational"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 29: Line 29:
  
 
=Candidate Artifacts=
 
=Candidate Artifacts=
** HL7 Reference Information Model (RIM)
+
* HL7 Reference Information Model (RIM)
** HL7 Abstract Data Types (ADT)
+
* HL7 Abstract Data Types (ADT)
** HL7 Vocabulary References
+
* HL7 Vocabulary References
** TermInfo Guides
+
* TermInfo Guides
** Clinical Document Architecture Model (CDA)
+
* Clinical Document Architecture Model (CDA)
** Clinical Statement Model
+
* Clinical Statement Model
** Orders and Requests Pattern Model
+
* Orders and Requests Pattern Model
** Implementable Tech Specification (ITS)
+
* Implementable Tech Specification (ITS)
** HL7 Foundation and Core Principles
+
* HL7 Foundation and Core Principles
** HL7 Development Framework (belong here or elsewhere)?
+
* HL7 Development Framework (belong here or elsewhere)?
** WC3 (for ITS)
+
* WC3 (for ITS)
** OMG (for ITS?)
+
* OMG (for ITS?)
  
 
=Examples=
 
=Examples=

Revision as of 03:18, 10 May 2009

Reference - Informational Owner PEL will do, ?? will review

Summary

  • Artifacts that can be used as reference for information viewpoint artifacts in subsequent conformance levels.

Detail - Reference Semantics at the Informational Level TODO

Traceability to Reference Material

TODO

Best Practices / Templates

TODO

Quality Criteria

TODO

Conformance Statement

TODO

Guidance on format of Conformance Statement

TODO


Relationship to and Consistency with other Viewpoints

TODO

Candidate Artifacts

  • HL7 Reference Information Model (RIM)
  • HL7 Abstract Data Types (ADT)
  • HL7 Vocabulary References
  • TermInfo Guides
  • Clinical Document Architecture Model (CDA)
  • Clinical Statement Model
  • Orders and Requests Pattern Model
  • Implementable Tech Specification (ITS)
  • HL7 Foundation and Core Principles
  • HL7 Development Framework (belong here or elsewhere)?
  • WC3 (for ITS)
  • OMG (for ITS?)

Examples

The following examples are full specifications. Following the link, the appropriate sections of the specifications that support the Computational Viewpoints are in brackets.

  • Example 1 - TODO
  • Example 2 - TODO
  • Example 3 - TODO


Back to SAEAF Specification Stack