This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "R2 Datatypes Taskforce"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
And then to shepherd all this through ballot as | And then to shepherd all this through ballot as | ||
agreed with INM on an ongoing basis. | agreed with INM on an ongoing basis. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We agree that we will ballot the work that has been done | ||
| + | at agreed times. Doug proposes to plan to do this about | ||
| + | once a year, but other factors, including particularly | ||
| + | ISO harmonisation, may influence the ballot schedule. | ||
Revision as of 21:03, 11 January 2007
Introduction
Members
Lead:
- Doug Pratt
- Grahame Grieve
Members:
- Lloyd Mackenzie
- Charlie McCay
- Lee Coller
- Gunther Schadow
- Mark Tucker (Secretary)
Coded Datatypes
- Stan Huff
- Cecil Lynch
Work Plan
The work plan is to work through the Datatypes R2 Issues. For each issue:
- analysing and resolve
- get approval from INM
- update the Abstract & ITS as appropriate
And then to shepherd all this through ballot as agreed with INM on an ongoing basis.
We agree that we will ballot the work that has been done at agreed times. Doug proposes to plan to do this about once a year, but other factors, including particularly ISO harmonisation, may influence the ballot schedule.
