Difference between revisions of "Patronymic name"
m (New page: {{InM Open Action Items}} '''Proposal 643 XPN: new type code for "patronymic name ''' category:Version2 Action Items Opened 20100114 assigned: Frank Oemig '''Description''' See doc...) |
m |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Opened 20100114 | Opened 20100114 | ||
assigned: Frank Oemig | assigned: Frank Oemig | ||
| + | reviewed 20110111 (sydney) | ||
'''Description''' | '''Description''' | ||
| − | See doc:[ | + | See doc: [[media:643.pdf |643.pdf]] |
| − | |||
| − | As a reminder: InM only accepts v2 proposals if a clear mapping is shown to v3. "patronymic name" isn't supported in Datatypes R2 yet (which I know because I brought forward the Scandinavian proposal for Mellom Navn, now included in R2, see http://www.vimeo.com/1604760, and http://www.hl7.org/v3ballot2010JAN/html/infrastructure/datatypes_r2/datatypes_r2.htm#prop-ENXP.qualifier). | + | Rene: As a reminder: InM only accepts v2 proposals if a clear mapping is shown to v3. "patronymic name" isn't supported in Datatypes R2 yet (which I know because I brought forward the Scandinavian proposal for Mellom Navn, now included in R2, see http://www.vimeo.com/1604760, and http://www.hl7.org/v3ballot2010JAN/html/infrastructure/datatypes_r2/datatypes_r2.htm#prop-ENXP.qualifier). |
| − | We discussed patronymic names at the time, but we didn't have anybody to defend the use case and bring forward a proposal. It's good to see we now (will) have a proposal.. | + | We discussed patronymic names at the time, but we didn't have anybody to defend the use case and bring forward a proposal. It's good to see we now (will) have a proposal.. So your proposal would have to cover a 'datatypes R3 proposal for "patronymic name" as well). Actually, the R3 proposal would be for MnM, given that they take care of the v3 datatypes nowadays. |
| − | |||
| − | So your proposal would have to cover a 'datatypes R3 proposal for "patronymic name" as well). Actually, the R3 proposal would be for MnM, given that they take care of the v3 datatypes nowadays. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 23:01, 10 January 2011
This is a page of type Category:InM Open Action Items.
Proposal 643 XPN: new type code for "patronymic name
Opened 20100114 assigned: Frank Oemig
reviewed 20110111 (sydney)
Description See doc: 643.pdf
Rene: As a reminder: InM only accepts v2 proposals if a clear mapping is shown to v3. "patronymic name" isn't supported in Datatypes R2 yet (which I know because I brought forward the Scandinavian proposal for Mellom Navn, now included in R2, see http://www.vimeo.com/1604760, and http://www.hl7.org/v3ballot2010JAN/html/infrastructure/datatypes_r2/datatypes_r2.htm#prop-ENXP.qualifier). We discussed patronymic names at the time, but we didn't have anybody to defend the use case and bring forward a proposal. It's good to see we now (will) have a proposal.. So your proposal would have to cover a 'datatypes R3 proposal for "patronymic name" as well). Actually, the R3 proposal would be for MnM, given that they take care of the v3 datatypes nowadays.
