This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "PCCR-041-Cardinality of contextControlCode in actRelationships"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 23: Line 23:
  
 
== Discussion ==
 
== Discussion ==
 +
PC to look through the consequences of the recent change in the RIM for conduction
  
 
== Recommended Action Items ==
 
== Recommended Action Items ==

Revision as of 00:46, 19 May 2011

ID PCCR-041
Description Cardinality of contextControlCode in actRelationships
Submitted by Nictiz
Submitted date 2011-01-05
Status proposed
Priority medium

Em.png

Please note:

  • Editing of Change Requests is restricted to the submitter and the co-chairs of the Patient Care Project.
  • Other changes will be undone.
  • Please add comments to the "discussion" page associated with this Change Request.

Back to Patient Care Change Requests page.
Back to Patient Care Wiki


Issue

All contextControlCode attributes in actRelationships are 1..1 R. This is not conformant to the standard use of contextControlCode in conjunction with contextConductionInd.

Recommendation

Change cardinality and conformance to 0..1 R and keep up with standard use of contextControlCode.

Patient Care Topic / Artefact

DMIM etc.

Rationale

Use Case: the author of the information in a patient record is almost always a regular GP. We identify this author at CareProvisionEvent and want to propagate this to all descendant information. If we specify dataEnterers or performers etc. this is the same. contextConductionInd will do the job, no need for contextControlCode in actRelationship.

Discussion

PC to look through the consequences of the recent change in the RIM for conduction

Recommended Action Items

Resolution

Tags

Revision History of this Change Request