This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "PAC: Meaningful Use Stage 1"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: [http://www.hl7.org/Special/committees/policy/index.cfm HL7 Policy Advisory Committee] back to Policy_Committee ==Discussion Topics== *Determining the Policy Committee’s purpose...)
 
 
(35 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[http://www.hl7.org/Special/committees/policy/index.cfm HL7 Policy Advisory Committee]
+
Back to [[Policy_Committee]]
  
back to [[Policy_Committee]]
+
This page provides the proposed rules, draft comments, and formal HL7 feedback to the three Meaningful Use Stage 1 proposed rules:
 
==Discussion Topics==
 
*Determining the Policy Committee’s purpose:  At which levels should HL7 engage?
 
**Shape public policy
 
**Inform entities (e.g., HHS, ONC, HIT Policy Committee, HIT Standards Committee, NCVHS, HITSP, CCHIT, international counterparts) what’s achievable through standards now and in the future
 
**Inform entities of the standards that currently exist, are in development
 
*What kinds of deliverables are suitable within the context of the advocacy continuum?
 
*Different advocacy, different processes: Authorship, approvals, and delivery may change by type of deliverable
 
*Level of viewpoints expressed by type of deliverable
 
**Expressing both viewpoints (agree and disagree)
 
**Expressing only one or the other viewpoint
 
  
 +
* EHR Incentive Program
 +
* Standards & Certification
 +
* [http://www.hl7.org/documentcenter/public/newsroom/Certification%20NPRM%20display%20copy%202010-04991_PI%20(2010-03-08).pdf Certification Program]
  
==Contributions==
+
Please add your comments/input under the appropriate heading below using the following [http://wiki.hl7.org/images/7/76/HL7_Policy_Advisory_Committee_Work_Group_Input_Templates.doc template]. Submissions that represent the position of a particular work group should be identified as such.
Please add comments to the wiki for review.  
 
  
You can also send input to the Policy Advisory Committee by clicking [mailto:policyinput@HL7.org?subject=Input%20for%20the%20Policy%20Advisory%20Committee here]
+
You can also send input to the PAC by clicking [mailto:policyinput@HL7.org?subject=Input%20for%20the%20Policy%20Advisory%20Committee here].  The policy committee will post this input to the wiki page.
 +
 
 +
==EHR Incentive Program NPRM and Standards and Certification IFR==
 +
 
 +
Comments from the Financial Management Work Group can be found at http://wiki.hl7.org/images/d/d2/FM_IFR_Comments.doc
 +
 
 +
Comments from the Public Health Emergency Response Work Group can be found at: http://www.hl7.org/library/committees/policy/PHER%20WG%20Meaningful%20Use%20and%20Standards%20Comments%2020100226.xlsx
 +
 
 +
Comments from John Moehrke on Security/Privacy can be found at: http://healthcaresecprivacy.blogspot.com/2010/02/securityprivacy-comments-on-ifr.html
 +
 
 +
Comments from the Security Work Group can be found at http://wiki.hl7.org/images/3/32/HL7_Security_Meaningful_Use.doc
 +
 
 +
Comments from the PHER WG can be found at:
 +
http://www.hl7.org/library/committees/policy/PHER%20WG%20Meaningful%20Use%20and%20Standards%20Comments%2020100226.xlsx
 +
 
 +
Comments from QRDA can be found at:
 +
http://wiki.hl7.org/images/9/94/IFR_Comments_from_QRDA.doc
 +
 
 +
Comments from the Records Management and Evidentiary Support cmt of the EHR WG can be found at:
 +
http://wiki.hl7.org/images/5/5d/RM-ES_Comments_IFR_Standards_NPRM_MU_2010-02-22.doc
 +
 
 +
Comments from the Structured Documents WG can be found at:
 +
http://wiki.hl7.org/images/9/9e/Comments_from_SDWG_on_IFR.doc
 +
 
 +
Comments from Gary Dickinson can be found at
 +
http://wiki.hl7.org/images/7/74/100228IFR-Response-Integrity-Constant.pdf
 +
 
 +
===HL7's Response===
 +
 
 +
HL7's response to the Meaningful Use NPRM can be found at:
 +
http://wiki.hl7.org/images/d/df/HL7_Meaningful_Use_NPRM_response_final_on_Letterhead.pdf
 +
 
 +
HL7's resonse to the standards and certification IFR can be found at:
 +
http://wiki.hl7.org/images/f/fe/HL7_response_to_standards_and_cert_IFR_on_Letterhead_final.pdf
 +
 
 +
==ONC Certification Program NPRM==
 +
 
 +
We opted not to respond to the Certification Program NPRM

Latest revision as of 21:17, 3 February 2012

Back to Policy_Committee

This page provides the proposed rules, draft comments, and formal HL7 feedback to the three Meaningful Use Stage 1 proposed rules:

Please add your comments/input under the appropriate heading below using the following template. Submissions that represent the position of a particular work group should be identified as such.

You can also send input to the PAC by clicking here. The policy committee will post this input to the wiki page.

EHR Incentive Program NPRM and Standards and Certification IFR

Comments from the Financial Management Work Group can be found at http://wiki.hl7.org/images/d/d2/FM_IFR_Comments.doc

Comments from the Public Health Emergency Response Work Group can be found at: http://www.hl7.org/library/committees/policy/PHER%20WG%20Meaningful%20Use%20and%20Standards%20Comments%2020100226.xlsx

Comments from John Moehrke on Security/Privacy can be found at: http://healthcaresecprivacy.blogspot.com/2010/02/securityprivacy-comments-on-ifr.html

Comments from the Security Work Group can be found at http://wiki.hl7.org/images/3/32/HL7_Security_Meaningful_Use.doc

Comments from the PHER WG can be found at: http://www.hl7.org/library/committees/policy/PHER%20WG%20Meaningful%20Use%20and%20Standards%20Comments%2020100226.xlsx

Comments from QRDA can be found at: http://wiki.hl7.org/images/9/94/IFR_Comments_from_QRDA.doc

Comments from the Records Management and Evidentiary Support cmt of the EHR WG can be found at: http://wiki.hl7.org/images/5/5d/RM-ES_Comments_IFR_Standards_NPRM_MU_2010-02-22.doc

Comments from the Structured Documents WG can be found at: http://wiki.hl7.org/images/9/9e/Comments_from_SDWG_on_IFR.doc

Comments from Gary Dickinson can be found at http://wiki.hl7.org/images/7/74/100228IFR-Response-Integrity-Constant.pdf

HL7's Response

HL7's response to the Meaningful Use NPRM can be found at: http://wiki.hl7.org/images/d/df/HL7_Meaningful_Use_NPRM_response_final_on_Letterhead.pdf

HL7's resonse to the standards and certification IFR can be found at: http://wiki.hl7.org/images/f/fe/HL7_response_to_standards_and_cert_IFR_on_Letterhead_final.pdf

ONC Certification Program NPRM

We opted not to respond to the Certification Program NPRM