This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "PAC: Meaningful Use Stage 1"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: [http://www.hl7.org/Special/committees/policy/index.cfm HL7 Policy Advisory Committee] back to Policy_Committee ==Discussion Topics== *Determining the Policy Committee’s purpose...)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
   
 
   
 
==Discussion Topics==
 
==Discussion Topics==
*Determining the Policy Committee’s purpose:  At which levels should HL7 engage?
+
*Meaningful Use NPRM
**Shape public policy
+
*Standards and Certification IFR
**Inform entities (e.g., HHS, ONC, HIT Policy Committee, HIT Standards Committee, NCVHS, HITSP, CCHIT, international counterparts) what’s achievable through standards now and in the future
 
**Inform entities of the standards that currently exist, are in development
 
*What kinds of deliverables are suitable within the context of the advocacy continuum?
 
*Different advocacy, different processes:  Authorship, approvals, and delivery may change by type of deliverable
 
*Level of viewpoints expressed by type of deliverable
 
**Expressing both viewpoints (agree and disagree)
 
**Expressing only one or the other viewpoint
 
 
 
  
 
==Contributions==
 
==Contributions==

Revision as of 12:58, 12 February 2010

HL7 Policy Advisory Committee

back to Policy_Committee

Discussion Topics

  • Meaningful Use NPRM
  • Standards and Certification IFR

Contributions

Please add comments to the wiki for review.

You can also send input to the Policy Advisory Committee by clicking here