This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "OO CReDOS-006 OM3 and OM4 Usage in M08 message"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
== Recommendation == | == Recommendation == | ||
| − | Make both "RE" (preferred) in base or make both "O" in base and "RE" in info component profile | + | Make both "RE" (preferred) in base or make both "O" in base and "RE" in info component profile. |
| − | |||
| − | |||
== Rationale == | == Rationale == | ||
Revision as of 00:31, 25 January 2014
Return to OO Change Requests page.
| Submitted by: Eric Haas | Revision date: Jan 23 2014 |
| Submitted date: Jan 23 2014 | Change request ID: OO CReDOS-006 |
| Standard/IG: Implementation Guide | Artifact ID, Name: OM3 and OM4 Usage in M08 message |
Issue
OM3 and OM4 Usage in M08 message are treated differently. OM2 is O in base whereas OM3 is not. They are both give additional information about results- one is for numeric and one is for non-numeric results - so why are the usages different.
Recommendation
Make both "RE" (preferred) in base or make both "O" in base and "RE" in info component profile.
Rationale
Treat these segments that are functionally similar the same.
