This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "OO CReDOS-004 Message Structure: Brackets for RE elements"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Category:OO Open eDOS IG Change Requests Return to OO Change Requests page. {|width=100% cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2 border=1 || '''Submitt...")
 
m
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:OO Open eDOS IG Change Requests]]
+
[[Category:OO Accepted eDOS IG Change Requests]]
  
 
Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page.
 
Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page.
Line 18: Line 18:
 
== Issue ==
 
== Issue ==
  
# P 45ff For the M10 and MO8 messages the OM4 has square brackets and since element is RE need to remove them.
 
#For the M04 message NTE segment has square brackets and is listed as RE.  Is this supposed to be O or RE if  RE then NTE segment is not defined in IG.
 
  
'''Background: " 2.12.1  Message representation '''
+
#For the M04 message NTE segment  is listed as RE. Is this supposed to be O or RE if  RE then NTE segment is not defined in IG.
For each trigger event the messages that are exchanged when the trigger event occurs are defined using the
 
HL7 abstract message syntax as follows:
 
Each message is defined in special notation that lists the segment IDs in the order they would appear in the
 
message. Braces, { . . . }, indicate one or more repetitions of the enclosed group of segments. Of course, the
 
group may contain only a single segment. Brackets, [  . . . ], show that the enclosed group of segments is  
 
optional. "
 
  
 
== Recommendation ==
 
== Recommendation ==
 
#Remove square bracket from OM4 segment for the  M10 and MO8 messages.
 
#List NTE segment as O in the MO4 message structure.
 
  
  
 +
#Change NTE  Usage to "O" in the MO4 message structure.
  
 
== Rationale ==
 
== Rationale ==
  
Conform to message representation rules in base standard.
+
Either constrain the NTE segment in IG or make O
  
 
== Discussion ==
 
== Discussion ==
 +
2014-03-11 The base standard has all fields in the NTE listed as ‘O’, so from a testing perspective we cannot create test data, since all the fields in the base standard for the NTE is optional – if you have a required element, you need to put something into one of the fields. –
 +
Prefer the guide just to match NTE to LOI and LRI, where NTE-1 is R [1..1] and NTE-3 is R and [1..*].
 +
 +
Please provide feedback on appropriate content for NTEs in M04 message currently in the eDOS sample messages
  
 
== Recommended Action Items ==
 
== Recommended Action Items ==
  
 
== Resolution ==
 
== Resolution ==
 +
2014-03-11 Motion: add NTE matching LRI/LOI wich requires NTE-1 and NTE-3 in harmonization of Lab IGs – Eric Haas, Mark Jones, no further discussion
 +
Vote:  Against:  0, Abstain:  0, Affirmative: 9

Latest revision as of 20:39, 17 March 2014


Return to OO Change Requests page.

Submitted by: Eric Haas Revision date: Jan 23 2014
Submitted date: Jan 23 2014 Change request ID: OO CReDOS-004
Standard/IG: Implementation Guide Artifact ID, Name: Message Structure: Brackets for RE elements


Issue

  1. For the M04 message NTE segment is listed as RE. Is this supposed to be O or RE if RE then NTE segment is not defined in IG.

Recommendation

  1. Change NTE Usage to "O" in the MO4 message structure.

Rationale

Either constrain the NTE segment in IG or make O

Discussion

2014-03-11 The base standard has all fields in the NTE listed as ‘O’, so from a testing perspective we cannot create test data, since all the fields in the base standard for the NTE is optional – if you have a required element, you need to put something into one of the fields. – Prefer the guide just to match NTE to LOI and LRI, where NTE-1 is R [1..1] and NTE-3 is R and [1..*].

Please provide feedback on appropriate content for NTEs in M04 message currently in the eDOS sample messages

Recommended Action Items

Resolution

2014-03-11 Motion: add NTE matching LRI/LOI wich requires NTE-1 and NTE-3 in harmonization of Lab IGs – Eric Haas, Mark Jones, no further discussion Vote: Against: 0, Abstain: 0, Affirmative: 9