This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
OO CRLRI-015 - Table 0125 comments
Revision as of 20:50, 15 July 2014 by Hbuitendijk (talk | contribs)
Return to OO Change Requests page.
Submitted by: Eric Haas | Revision date: Jan 23 2014 |
Submitted date: Jan 23 2014 | Change request ID: OO CRLRI-015 |
Standard/IG: Implementation Guide | Artifact ID, Name: Table 0125 comments |
Issue
editorial suggestion
align action verbs in comments with conformance usage.
Recommendation
LRI table 0125 comments for SN row change comment to “...The units for the numeric value shall be reported in OBX-6.” And for ST row change comment to “…These shall be reported as NM or SN numeric results,...
Rationale
align comments with conformance usage.
Discussion
Recommended Action Items
Resolution
- July 15, 2014 - Motion to include in LOI on OBX-6 the same statement as in LRI " Note: If there is not a unit of measure available while the Condition Predicate is True, the value “NA” shall be used in CWE_CRE.1 and “HL70353” in CWE_CRE.3."; change the statement for the SN row to “...The units for the numeric value shall be reported in OBX-6.”. Bob Dieterle, Les Keepper
- Discussion
- Address Unknown in value set vs. Unknown in HL70353 meaning.
- Note that table references may change as appropriate as part of the value set discussions.
- Against: 0; Abstain: 6; In Favor: 6
- Discussion