This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "OO CR193 - ORC-9 DefinitionClarification and new field for Date Order placed"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 30: Line 30:
  
 
== Recommended Action Items ==
 
== Recommended Action Items ==
20180129 - Decided to table until later in the week and give people time to consider this issue.
+
20180129 - Discussed changing the name of OBX-9 from "Date/Time of Transaction" to "Date/Time of Order Event" as well as the addition of a new ORC field to capture ORC-nn "New Order Date/Time".
 +
Lots of discussion about defining "New Order Date/Time" in various use cases such as paper requisitions and if the "Date/Time" reflects when the paper was written vs when the order was loaded into the system.
 +
Decided to table until later in the week and give people time to consider this issue.
  
 
== Resolution ==
 
== Resolution ==
 +
20180301: Motion to approve with the caveat that we confirm the numbering of the field Riki Merrick, Lorraine Constable
 +
further discussion: should name be Order Date/Time, or Order placement Date/Time - that would mean it is populated for future orders – yes; friendly amendment is accepted to use Order Creation Date/Time as the name of the field
 +
against: 1, abstain: 3, in favor: 10

Revision as of 14:32, 8 March 2018

Return to OO Change Requests page.

Submitted by: Riki Merrick Revision date: <<Revision Date>>
Submitted date: 27-Jan-2018 Change request ID: HL7 CR dB ID#863
Standard/IG: Standard Artifact ID, Name: <<Artifact ID, Name>>

Issue

See File:ORC 9 DefinitionClarification.docx for problem definition and proposal - can track version history. Latest version is on dB: http://www.hl7.org/memonly/dbtracker/display_detail.cfm?trackerid=863

Recommendation

Rationale

Discussion

Recommended Action Items

20180129 - Discussed changing the name of OBX-9 from "Date/Time of Transaction" to "Date/Time of Order Event" as well as the addition of a new ORC field to capture ORC-nn "New Order Date/Time". Lots of discussion about defining "New Order Date/Time" in various use cases such as paper requisitions and if the "Date/Time" reflects when the paper was written vs when the order was loaded into the system. Decided to table until later in the week and give people time to consider this issue.

Resolution

20180301: Motion to approve with the caveat that we confirm the numbering of the field Riki Merrick, Lorraine Constable further discussion: should name be Order Date/Time, or Order placement Date/Time - that would mean it is populated for future orders – yes; friendly amendment is accepted to use Order Creation Date/Time as the name of the field against: 1, abstain: 3, in favor: 10