Difference between revisions of "OO CR193 - ORC-9 DefinitionClarification and new field for Date Order placed"
Riki merrick (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{OO Open Change Requests}} {{OO Open V2.9 Change Requests}} Return to OO Change Requests page. {|width=100% cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2 bord...") |
Riki merrick (talk | contribs) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|| '''Submitted date:''' 27-Jan-2018 | || '''Submitted date:''' 27-Jan-2018 | ||
− | || '''Change request ID:''' HL7 CR dB ID# | + | || '''Change request ID:''' HL7 CR dB ID#863 |
|- | |- | ||
|| '''Standard/IG:''' Standard | || '''Standard/IG:''' Standard | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
See [[Image:ORC_9_DefinitionClarification.docx]] for problem definition and proposal - can track version history. | See [[Image:ORC_9_DefinitionClarification.docx]] for problem definition and proposal - can track version history. | ||
Latest version is on dB: | Latest version is on dB: | ||
− | http://www.hl7.org/memonly/dbtracker/display_detail.cfm?trackerid= | + | http://www.hl7.org/memonly/dbtracker/display_detail.cfm?trackerid=863 |
== Recommendation == | == Recommendation == | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
== Recommended Action Items == | == Recommended Action Items == | ||
− | + | 20180129 - Discussed changing the name of OBX-9 from "Date/Time of Transaction" to "Date/Time of Order Event" as well as the addition of a new ORC field to capture ORC-nn "New Order Date/Time". | |
+ | Lots of discussion about defining "New Order Date/Time" in various use cases such as paper requisitions and if the "Date/Time" reflects when the paper was written vs when the order was loaded into the system. | ||
+ | Decided to table until later in the week and give people time to consider this issue. | ||
== Resolution == | == Resolution == | ||
+ | 20180301: Motion to approve with the caveat that we confirm the numbering of the field Riki Merrick, Lorraine Constable | ||
+ | further discussion: should name be Order Date/Time, or Order placement Date/Time - that would mean it is populated for future orders – yes; friendly amendment is accepted to use Order Creation Date/Time as the name of the field | ||
+ | against: 1, abstain: 3, in favor: 10 |
Latest revision as of 21:44, 8 March 2018
Return to OO Change Requests page.
Submitted by: Riki Merrick | Revision date: <<Revision Date>> |
Submitted date: 27-Jan-2018 | Change request ID: HL7 CR dB ID#863 |
Standard/IG: Standard | Artifact ID, Name: <<Artifact ID, Name>> |
Issue
See File:ORC 9 DefinitionClarification.docx for problem definition and proposal - can track version history. Latest version is on dB: http://www.hl7.org/memonly/dbtracker/display_detail.cfm?trackerid=863
Recommendation
Rationale
Discussion
Recommended Action Items
20180129 - Discussed changing the name of OBX-9 from "Date/Time of Transaction" to "Date/Time of Order Event" as well as the addition of a new ORC field to capture ORC-nn "New Order Date/Time". Lots of discussion about defining "New Order Date/Time" in various use cases such as paper requisitions and if the "Date/Time" reflects when the paper was written vs when the order was loaded into the system. Decided to table until later in the week and give people time to consider this issue.
Resolution
20180301: Motion to approve with the caveat that we confirm the numbering of the field Riki Merrick, Lorraine Constable further discussion: should name be Order Date/Time, or Order placement Date/Time - that would mean it is populated for future orders – yes; friendly amendment is accepted to use Order Creation Date/Time as the name of the field against: 1, abstain: 3, in favor: 10