This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here

Difference between revisions of "OO CR182-836 - Changes to INV, EQU, and related tables"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 46: Line 46:
  
 
== Resolution ==
 
== Resolution ==
 +
OO conference call on 16 April 2015:
 +
* has gotten feedback from Vocab, CGIT and OO
 +
* We can rename fields and update tables, Added new codes to HL70365
 +
* Motion to accept: Dmytro, Eric
 +
** Against: 0; Abstain: 7; In Favor: 8
 +
 +
--[[User:Dmytro rud|Dmytro]] ([[User talk:Dmytro rud|talk]]) 06:55, 1 May 2015 (EDT)

Revision as of 10:55, 1 May 2015


Return to OO Change Requests page.

Submitted by: Dmytro Rud Revision date: <<Revision Date>>
Submitted date: 17-Mar-2015 Change request ID: OO CRxxx
Standard/IG: Standard Artifact ID, Name: <<Artifact ID, Name>>

Issue

See [1] for problem definition and proposal.

Recommendation

Rationale

Discussion

  • Item 2.
    • In messages INR^U06 “Automated Equipment Inventory Request”, fields of the INV segment serve as filtering criteria. From the logical point of view, when no filtering on inventory item ID and/or inventory item status is desired, the corresponding fields INV 1 and INV 2 do not need to be populated. But currently they are required in HL7. It is proposed to make them conditional C(O/R), with the condition that MSH-9 1 equals to “INR” and MSH 9 2 equals to “U06”.
    • Due to the backward compatibility requirements defined in Chapter 2.8.2.c.4 " Existing required fields may be made conditional if a new trigger event has been applied. The condition must be specified such that the field remains required for the pre-existing trigger events." Since this is an existing trigger event, this change cannot be made.

Tony Julian (talk) 10:12, 17 March 2015 (EDT)

  • Item 4:
    • Segment INV in INR^U06^INR_U06 shall be optional in order to enable queries without filtering on particular inventory item attributes
    • Due to the backward compatibility requirements defined in Chapter 2 existing required segments cannot be made optional.

Tony Julian (talk) 10:12, 17 March 2015 (EDT)

The CR is changed: instead of redefining INR^U06^INR_U06, INR^U14^INR_U14 is introduced. --Dmytro (talk) 11:31, 17 March 2015 (EDT)

CR changed:

  • Do not do anything with table 0451.
  • Provide code descriptions for table 0365, change new codes.

--Dmytro (talk) 11:04, 15 April 2015 (EDT)

Recommended Action Items

Resolution

OO conference call on 16 April 2015:

  • has gotten feedback from Vocab, CGIT and OO
  • We can rename fields and update tables, Added new codes to HL70365
  • Motion to accept: Dmytro, Eric
    • Against: 0; Abstain: 7; In Favor: 8

--Dmytro (talk) 06:55, 1 May 2015 (EDT)