This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "OO CR165-809 OM1-58-59"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 24: Line 24:
 
== Recommended Action Items ==
 
== Recommended Action Items ==
 
== Resolution ==
 
== Resolution ==
 +
From 28 August 2014 Orders & Observations Minutes:
 +
OM1 Fields – Freida Hall
 +
http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=OO_CR165-809_OM1-58-59
 +
For base and included in eDOS for Jan2015 ballot – add restriction indication for age (number range in years) (lists the range for which the test is allowed) and gender (using HL70001) for tests (no pap smear on males) is reimbursement related. These fields are O in the base and for eDOS these fields would be RE, both fields are repeating.
 +
 +
Motion to approve as documented.  Freida Hall, Riki Merrick
 +
Against: 0; Abstain: 1; In Favor: 20

Revision as of 19:38, 8 September 2014

Return to OO Change Requests page.

Submitted by: Freida Hall Revision date: <<Revision Date>>
Submitted date: August 25, 2014 Change request ID:
Standard/IG: Standard Artifact ID, Name: |-

Issue

See V2 Proposal Database #809 for problem definition and proposal: [1] -or- See File:OO CR165-809 OM1-58-59.docx for problem definition and proposal.

This proposal adds two new fields to the OM1 segment in V2.8.2 and eDOS to support US Realm regulatory requirements to restrict certain lab tests based on age or gender.

Recommendation

Rationale

Discussion

Recommended Action Items

Resolution

From 28 August 2014 Orders & Observations Minutes: OM1 Fields – Freida Hall http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=OO_CR165-809_OM1-58-59 For base and included in eDOS for Jan2015 ballot – add restriction indication for age (number range in years) (lists the range for which the test is allowed) and gender (using HL70001) for tests (no pap smear on males) is reimbursement related. These fields are O in the base and for eDOS these fields would be RE, both fields are repeating.

Motion to approve as documented. Freida Hall, Riki Merrick Against: 0; Abstain: 1; In Favor: 20